| nr |
titel |
auteur |
tijdschrift |
jaar |
jaarg. |
afl. |
pagina('s) |
type |
| 1 |
American thyroid association guidelines are inconsistent with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations—A meta-epidemiologic study
|
Bautista-Orduno, Karen Gabriela
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. 180-188.e2
|
artikel
|
| 2 |
A modified Prevalence Incidence Analysis Model method may improve disease prevalence prediction
|
Novikov, Ilya
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. 18-26
|
artikel
|
| 3 |
An embedded mixed-methods study highlighted a lack of discussions on retention in clinical trial consultations
|
Tunji-Ajayi, Pamela
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. 49-58
|
artikel
|
| 4 |
Asking questions changes health-related behavior: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
|
Miles, Lisa M.
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. 59-68
|
artikel
|
| 5 |
A systematic review and external validation of stroke prediction models demonstrates poor performance in dialysis patients
|
de Jong, Ype
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. 69-79
|
artikel
|
| 6 |
A systematic survey showed important limitations in the methods for assessing drug safety among systematic reviews
|
Li, Ling
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. 80-90
|
artikel
|
| 7 |
Bayesian analysis from phase III trials was underused and poorly reported: a systematic review
|
Ferreira, David
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. 107-113
|
artikel
|
| 8 |
Cochrane risk of bias tool was used inadequately in the majority of non-Cochrane systematic reviews
|
Puljak, Livia
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. 114-119
|
artikel
|
| 9 |
Controversy and Debate on Meta-epidemiology. Paper 3: Causal inference from meta-epidemiology: a reasonable goal, or wishful thinking?
|
Christensen, Robin
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. 131-132
|
artikel
|
| 10 |
Controversy and Debate on Meta-epidemiology. Paper 4: Confounding and other concerns in meta-epidemiological studies of bias
|
Page, Matthew J.
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. 133-134
|
artikel
|
| 11 |
Controversy and Debate on Meta-epidemiology. Paper 2: Meta-epidemiological studies of bias may themselves be biased
|
Herbert, Robert D.
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. 127-130
|
artikel
|
| 12 |
Controversy and Debate on Meta-epidemiology. Paper 1: Treatment effect sizes vary in randomized trials depending on the type of outcome measure
|
Berthelsen, Dorthe B.
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. 27-38
|
artikel
|
| 13 |
COVID-19 coronavirus research has overall low methodological quality thus far: case in point for chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine
|
Alexander, Paul Elias
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. 120-126
|
artikel
|
| 14 |
Editorial Board
|
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. IFC
|
artikel
|
| 15 |
Erratum to “A systematic survey identified 36 criteria for assessing effect modification claims in randomized trials or meta-analyses” [J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;113:159-67]
|
Schandelmaier, Stefan
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. 189
|
artikel
|
| 16 |
Exclusion of studies with no events in both arms in meta-analysis impacted the conclusions
|
Xu, Chang
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. 91-99
|
artikel
|
| 17 |
External factors may influence Cochrane reviewers when classifying the risk of bias of original reports
|
Bertizzolo, Lorenzo
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. 1-8
|
artikel
|
| 18 |
Future of evidence ecosystem series: 2. current opportunities and need for better tools and methods
|
Créquit, Perrine
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. 143-152
|
artikel
|
| 19 |
Future of Evidence Ecosystem Series: Evidence ecosystems and learning health systems: why bother?
|
Vandvik, Per Olav
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. 166-170
|
artikel
|
| 20 |
Future of Evidence Ecosystem Series: Evidence synthesis 2.0: when systematic, scoping, rapid, living, and overviews of reviews come together
|
Akl, Elie A.
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. 162-165
|
artikel
|
| 21 |
Future of evidence ecosystem series: 3. From an evidence synthesis ecosystem to an evidence ecosystem
|
Ravaud, Philippe
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. 153-161
|
artikel
|
| 22 |
Future of evidence ecosystem series: 1. Introduction Evidence synthesis ecosystem needs dramatic change
|
Boutron, Isabelle
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. 135-142
|
artikel
|
| 23 |
Handsearching had best recall but poor efficiency when exporting to a bibliographic tool: case study
|
Cooper, Chris
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. 39-48
|
artikel
|
| 24 |
Inconsistent views among systematic review authors toward publishing protocols as peer-reviewed articles: an international survey
|
Rombey, Tanja
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. 9-17
|
artikel
|
| 25 |
Lessons from COVID-19 to future evidence synthesis efforts: first living search strategy and out of date scientific publishing and indexing industry
|
Shokraneh, Farhad
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. 171-173
|
artikel
|
| 26 |
Limiting the search period in methodological studies
|
Puljak, Livia
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. 175-176
|
artikel
|
| 27 |
Online survey about the STROBE statement highlighted diverging views about its content, purpose, and value
|
Sharp, Melissa K.
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. 100-106
|
artikel
|
| 28 |
Reply to letter to the editor “Lessons from COVID-19 to future evidence synthesis efforts: first living search strategy and out of date scientific publishing and indexing industry”
|
Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. 173-174
|
artikel
|
| 29 |
Reporting scoping reviews—PRISMA ScR extension
|
McGowan, Jessie
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. 177-179
|
artikel
|
| 30 |
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. A3-A5
|
artikel
|
| 31 |
The new normal
|
|
|
|
123 |
C |
p. A7-A9
|
artikel
|
Tijdschrift beschrijving