IBL Tool - Digital Library

Digital Library

Journal description

All volumes of the corresponding journal

All issues of the corresponding volume

All articles of the corresponding issues

31 results found

no	title	author	magazine	year	volume	issue	page(s)	type
1	American thyroid association guidelines are inconsistent with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations—A meta-epidemiologic study	Bautista-Orduno, Karen Gabriela			123	C	p. 180-188.e2	article
2	A modified Prevalence Incidence Analysis Model method may improve disease prevalence prediction	Novikov, Ilya			123	C	p. 18-26	article
3	An embedded mixed-methods study highlighted a lack of discussions on retention in clinical trial consultations	Tunji-Ajayi, Pamela			123	C	p. 49-58	article
4	Asking questions changes health-related behavior: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis	Miles, Lisa M.			123	C	p. 59-68	article
5	A systematic review and external validation of stroke prediction models demonstrates poor performance in dialysis patients	de Jong, Ype			123	C	p. 69-79	article
6	A systematic survey showed important limitations in the methods for assessing drug safety among systematic reviews	Li, Ling			123	C	p. 80-90	article
7	Bayesian analysis from phase III trials was underused and poorly reported: a systematic review	Ferreira, David			123	C	p. 107-113	article
8	Cochrane risk of bias tool was used inadequately in the majority of non-Cochrane systematic reviews	Puljak, Livia			123	C	p. 114-119	article
9	Controversy and Debate on Meta-epidemiology. Paper 3: Causal inference from meta-epidemiology: a reasonable goal, or wishful thinking?	Christensen, Robin			123	C	p. 131-132	article
10	Controversy and Debate on Meta-epidemiology. Paper 4: Confounding and other concerns in meta-epidemiological studies of bias	Page, Matthew J.			123	C	p. 133-134	article
11	Controversy and Debate on Meta-epidemiology. Paper 2: Meta-epidemiological studies of bias may themselves be biased	Herbert, Robert D.			123	C	p. 127-130	article
12	Controversy and Debate on Meta-epidemiology. Paper 1: Treatment effect sizes vary in randomized trials depending on the type of outcome measure	Berthelsen, Dorthe B.			123	C	p. 27-38	article
13	COVID-19 coronavirus research has overall low methodological quality thus far: case in point for chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine	Alexander, Paul Elias			123	C	p. 120-126	article
14	Editorial Board				123	C	p. IFC	article
15	Erratum to “A systematic survey identified 36 criteria for assessing effect modification claims in randomized trials or meta-analyses” [J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;113:159-67]	Schandelmaier, Stefan			123	C	p. 189	article
16	Exclusion of studies with no events in both arms in meta-analysis impacted the conclusions	Xu, Chang			123	C	p. 91-99	article
17	External factors may influence Cochrane reviewers when classifying the risk of bias of original reports	Bertizzolo, Lorenzo			123	C	p. 1-8	article
18	Future of evidence ecosystem series: 2. current opportunities and need for better tools and methods	Créquit, Perrine			123	C	p. 143-152	article
19	Future of Evidence Ecosystem Series: Evidence ecosystems and learning health systems: why bother?	Vandvik, Per Olav			123	C	p. 166-170	article
20	Future of Evidence Ecosystem Series: Evidence synthesis 2.0: when systematic, scoping, rapid, living, and overviews of reviews come together	Akl, Elie A.			123	C	p. 162-165	article
21	Future of evidence ecosystem series: 3. From an evidence synthesis ecosystem to an evidence ecosystem	Ravaud, Philippe			123	C	p. 153-161	article
22	Future of evidence ecosystem series: 1. Introduction Evidence synthesis ecosystem needs dramatic change	Boutron, Isabelle			123	C	p. 135-142	article
23	Handsearching had best recall but poor efficiency when exporting to a bibliographic tool: case study	Cooper, Chris			123	C	p. 39-48	article
24	Inconsistent views among systematic review authors toward publishing protocols as peer-reviewed articles: an international survey	Rombey, Tanja			123	C	p. 9-17	article
25	Lessons from COVID-19 to future evidence synthesis efforts: first living search strategy and out of date scientific publishing and indexing industry	Shokraneh, Farhad			123	C	p. 171-173	article
26	Limiting the search period in methodological studies	Puljak, Livia			123	C	p. 175-176	article
27	Online survey about the STROBE statement highlighted diverging views about its content, purpose, and value	Sharp, Melissa K.			123	C	p. 100-106	article
28	Reply to letter to the editor “Lessons from COVID-19 to future evidence synthesis efforts: first living search strategy and out of date scientific publishing and indexing industry”	Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara			123	C	p. 173-174	article
29	Reporting scoping reviews—PRISMA ScR extension	McGowan, Jessie			123	C	p. 177-179	article
30	Table of Contents				123	C	p. A3-A5	article
31	The new normal				123	C	p. A7-A9	article

31 results found

Koninklijke Bibliotheek - National Library of the Netherlands