|
| << vorige | volgende >> |
Tijdschrift beschrijving
Alle jaargangen van het bijbehorende tijdschrift
Alle afleveringen van het bijbehorende jaargang
Alle artikelen van de bijbehorende aflevering
Details van artikel 5 van 7 gevonden artikelen
| Titel: |
Peer assessment in university teaching: evaluating seven course designs |
| Auteur: |
Berg, Ineke van den Admiraal, Wilfried Pilot, Albert |
| Verschenen in: |
Assessment and evaluation in higher education |
| Paginering: | Jaargang 31 (2006) nr. 1 pagina's 19-36 |
| Jaar: |
2006-02 |
| Inhoud: |
Peer assessment is understood to be an arrangement with students assessing the quality of their fellow students' writings and giving feedback to each other. This multiple-case study of seven designs of peer assessment focuses on the contribution of peer assessment to the acquisition of undergraduates' writing skills. Its aim is to arrive at an optimal design of peer assessment. Factors included in this study are: the quality of peer assessment activities, the interaction between students in oral peer feedback, students' learning outcomes, and their evaluation of peer assessment. Most students took assessing the work of their fellow students seriously, and included the peer feedback in the revision of their work. In most conversations, students provided feedback in an evaluative manner. In others, the interaction was more exploratory. For peer assessment, we recommend a combination of written and oral peer feedback. |
| Uitgever: |
Routledge |
| Bronbestand: |
Elektronische Wetenschappelijke Tijdschriften |
Details van artikel 5 van 7 gevonden artikelen
| << vorige | volgende >> |