| nr |
titel |
auteur |
tijdschrift |
jaar |
jaarg. |
afl. |
pagina('s) |
type |
| 1 |
Accommodating Legal Pluralism in Pacific Courts: Problems of Proof of Customary Law
|
Corrin, Jennifer
|
|
2011
|
|
1 |
p. 1-25
|
artikel
|
| 2 |
Admissibility in Criminal Proceedings of Third Party and Real Evidence Obtained by Methods Prohibited by UNCAT
|
Pattenden, Rosemary
|
|
2006
|
|
1 |
p. 1-41
|
artikel
|
| 3 |
Adverse Inferences and the Right to Silence: R v Beckles and Montague
|
Easton, Susan
|
|
2000
|
|
1 |
p. 63-68
|
artikel
|
| 4 |
A New Theoretical Framework regarding the Application and Reliability of Photographic Evidence
|
Porter, Glenn
|
|
2011
|
|
1 |
p. 26-61
|
artikel
|
| 5 |
An Unsatisfactory Stalemate: R (on the Application of Prudential plc) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax
|
Loughrey, Joan
|
|
2014
|
|
1 |
p. 65-77
|
artikel
|
| 6 |
Beliefs about suspect alibis: A survey of lay people in the United Kingdom, Israel, and Sweden
|
Portnoy, Shiri
|
|
|
|
1 |
p. 59-74
|
artikel
|
| 7 |
Book Review: Defendant Participation in the Criminal Process
|
Thomason, Matt
|
|
2018
|
|
1 |
p. 79-81
|
artikel
|
| 8 |
Book Review: Improperly Obtained Evidence in Anglo-American and Continental Law
|
Ward, Tony
|
|
|
|
1 |
p. 95-96
|
artikel
|
| 9 |
Case Commentaries
|
Pattenden, Rosemary
|
|
2010
|
|
1 |
p. 63-84
|
artikel
|
| 10 |
Case Commentaries
|
Pattenden, Rosemary
|
|
2011
|
|
1 |
p. 70-85
|
artikel
|
| 11 |
Case Commentaries
|
Pattenden, Rosemary
|
|
2012
|
|
1 |
p. 106-127
|
artikel
|
| 12 |
Case commentaries
|
Gans, Jeremy
|
|
2018
|
|
1 |
p. 82-84
|
artikel
|
| 13 |
Case commentaries
|
Gans, Jeremy
|
|
2016
|
|
1 |
p. 78-82
|
artikel
|
| 14 |
Case commentary
|
Plaxton, Michael
|
|
|
|
1 |
p. 97-99
|
artikel
|
| 15 |
Child Pornography: Balancing Substantive and Evidential Law to Safeguard Children Effectively from Abuse
|
Gillespie, Alisdair A.
|
|
2005
|
|
1 |
p. 29-49
|
artikel
|
| 16 |
Clarifying the Burden of Persuasion: What Bayesian Decision Rules Do and Do Not Do
|
Kaye, D.H.
|
|
1999
|
|
1 |
p. 1-28
|
artikel
|
| 17 |
Confessions to Mr Big
|
Murphy, Brendon
|
|
2016
|
|
1 |
p. 29-48
|
artikel
|
| 18 |
Constructing the Pre-Trial Role of the Defence in French Criminal Procedure: An Adversarial Outsider in an Inquisitorial Process?
|
Hodgson, Jacqueline
|
|
2002
|
|
1 |
p. 1-16
|
artikel
|
| 19 |
Correspondence
|
Tapper, Colin
|
|
2004
|
|
1 |
p. 68-68
|
artikel
|
| 20 |
Corroboration and Care Warnings after Makanjuola
|
Hartshorne, John
|
|
1998
|
|
1 |
p. 1-12
|
artikel
|
| 21 |
Credibility Contests: The Elephant in the Room
|
Green, Michael
|
|
2014
|
|
1 |
p. 28-40
|
artikel
|
| 22 |
Disclosure of Evidence and Legal Assistance at Custodial Interrogation: What Does the European Convention on Human Rights Require?
|
Toney, Raymond J.
|
|
2001
|
|
1 |
p. 39-60
|
artikel
|
| 23 |
‘Don't Look Back’: The Exclusion of Evidence and the Constitutional Rights of the Accused. A Caribbean Commonwealth Perspective
|
O'Brien, Derek
|
|
2000
|
|
1 |
p. 45-62
|
artikel
|
| 24 |
Drawing Inferences from Positive Suggestions Put to Witnesses: R v Webber
|
Nash, Susan
|
|
2005
|
|
1 |
p. 50-54
|
artikel
|
| 25 |
Drug Dealing and the Presumption of Innocence: The Human Rights Act (Almost) Bites
|
Roberts, Paul
|
|
2002
|
|
1 |
p. 17-37
|
artikel
|
| 26 |
Due Process and the Admission of Expert Evidence on Recovered Memory in Historic Child Sexual Abuse Cases: Lessons from America
|
Ring, Sinéad
|
|
2012
|
|
1 |
p. 66-92
|
artikel
|
| 27 |
Editorial
|
McConville, Mike
|
|
1996
|
|
1 |
p. 3-3
|
artikel
|
| 28 |
Evidencing domestic violence*, including behaviour that falls under the new offence of ‘controlling or coercive behaviour’
|
Bishop, Charlotte
|
|
2018
|
|
1 |
p. 3-29
|
artikel
|
| 29 |
Exclusion of Evidence: DPP (Walsh) v Cash
|
Daly, Yvonne Marie
|
|
2011
|
|
1 |
p. 62-69
|
artikel
|
| 30 |
Expert Evidence on the Reliability of Eyewitness Identification—Some Observations on the Justifications for Exclusion: Gage v HM Advocate
|
Roberts, Andrew
|
|
2012
|
|
1 |
p. 93-105
|
artikel
|
| 31 |
Expert Witness Evidence in Sexual Assault Trials: Questions, Answers and Law Reform in Australia and England
|
Cossins, Annie
|
|
2013
|
|
1 |
p. 74-113
|
artikel
|
| 32 |
Eyewitness Identification and Expert Insight: R v Forbes
|
Roberts, Andrew
|
|
2010
|
|
1 |
p. 57-62
|
artikel
|
| 33 |
‘Face to Face’: Rediscovering the Right to Confront Prosecution Witnesses
|
Friedman, Richard D.
|
|
2004
|
|
1 |
p. 1-30
|
artikel
|
| 34 |
Fair's Fair?
|
Tapper, Colin
|
|
2008
|
|
1 |
p. 53-57
|
artikel
|
| 35 |
Filling in the Blanks for Litigation Privilege: Blank v Canada (Minister of Justice)
|
Ives, Dale E.
|
|
2007
|
|
1 |
p. 49-56
|
artikel
|
| 36 |
From ad Hoc to Hybrid—The Rules and Regulations Governing Reception of Expert Evidence at the International Criminal Court
|
Derham, Roger
|
|
2010
|
|
1 |
p. 25-56
|
artikel
|
| 37 |
Guilty; But of What?
|
Hirst, Michael
|
|
2000
|
|
1 |
p. 31-44
|
artikel
|
| 38 |
In Defence of Vulnerable Witnesses: The Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999
|
McEwan, Jenny
|
|
2000
|
|
1 |
p. 1-30
|
artikel
|
| 39 |
Independent Issuing of Search Warrants: Damache v DPP
|
Daly, Yvonne Marie
|
|
2013
|
|
1 |
p. 114-122
|
artikel
|
| 40 |
In Memoriam
|
Barelli, Mauro
|
|
2018
|
|
1 |
p. 87-88
|
artikel
|
| 41 |
Inter-agency evidence sharing in competition law enforcement
|
Martyniszyn, Marek
|
|
2015
|
|
1 |
p. 11-28
|
artikel
|
| 42 |
‘In the interests of justice’ as the new test to exclude relevant evidence in Singapore: ANB v ANC [2014] SGHC 172; Wan Lai Ting v Kea Kah Kim [2014] SGHC 180
|
Siyuan, Chen
|
|
2015
|
|
1 |
p. 67-72
|
artikel
|
| 43 |
Is it Constitutionally Permissible to Infringe the Right to Remain Silent?
|
Schwikkard, P. J.
|
|
2001
|
|
1 |
p. 32-38
|
artikel
|
| 44 |
Is Judicial Proof of Facts a Form of Scientific Explanation? A Preliminary Investigation of ‘Clinical’ Legal Method
|
Menashe, Doron
|
|
2008
|
|
1 |
p. 32-52
|
artikel
|
| 45 |
Is Reliability Sufficient? The Law Commission and Expert Evidence in International and Interdisciplinary Perspective (Part 1)
|
Edmond, Gary
|
|
2012
|
|
1 |
p. 30-65
|
artikel
|
| 46 |
Judicial Discretion: Victimising the Villains?
|
Doherty, Michael
|
|
1999
|
|
1 |
p. 44-56
|
artikel
|
| 47 |
Judicial Fact-Finding and the Bayesian Method: The Case for Deeper Scepticism about Their Combination
|
Stein, Alex
|
|
1996
|
|
1 |
p. 25-47
|
artikel
|
| 48 |
Judicial Independence and Anti-Terrorism Legislation in Canada: Blurring the Investigative and Judicial Functions: Re an Application under s. 83.28 of the Criminal Code
|
Sheldrick, Byron M.
|
|
2006
|
|
1 |
p. 75-80
|
artikel
|
| 49 |
Judicial Notice Extended: Mullen v Hackney London Borough Council
|
Allen, Christopher
|
|
1998
|
|
1 |
p. 37-43
|
artikel
|
| 50 |
Law reform and source material
|
Gans, Jeremy
|
|
2015
|
|
1 |
p. 73-75
|
artikel
|
| 51 |
Legal Advice and Pre-Trial Silence—Unreasonable Developments
|
Cooper, Simon
|
|
2006
|
|
1 |
p. 60-69
|
artikel
|
| 52 |
Legal versus non-legal approaches to forensic science evidence
|
Edmond, Gary
|
|
2016
|
|
1 |
p. 3-28
|
artikel
|
| 53 |
Litigants in Person and Their Difficulties in Adducing Evidence: A Study of Small Claims in an English County Court
|
Lewis, Paul
|
|
2007
|
|
1 |
p. 24-48
|
artikel
|
| 54 |
Miranda Exclusionary Rule Re-Affirmed: US v Dickerson
|
Mirfield, Peter
|
|
2001
|
|
1 |
p. 61-67
|
artikel
|
| 55 |
Need Verdicts Come in Pairs?
|
Laudan, Larry
|
|
2010
|
|
1 |
p. 1-24
|
artikel
|
| 56 |
Noticeboard
|
|
|
2010
|
|
1 |
p. 85-88
|
artikel
|
| 57 |
Noticeboard
|
|
|
2012
|
|
1 |
p. 128-152
|
artikel
|
| 58 |
Noticeboard
|
|
|
2014
|
|
1 |
p. 78-81
|
artikel
|
| 59 |
Noticeboard
|
|
|
2011
|
|
1 |
p. 86-88
|
artikel
|
| 60 |
Noticeboard
|
|
|
2009
|
|
1 |
p. 79-81
|
artikel
|
| 61 |
Noticeboard
|
|
|
2007
|
|
1 |
p. 57-68
|
artikel
|
| 62 |
Noticeboard
|
|
|
2008
|
|
1 |
p. 64-88
|
artikel
|
| 63 |
Noticeboard
|
|
|
2004
|
|
1 |
p. 69-76
|
artikel
|
| 64 |
Noticeboard
|
|
|
2005
|
|
1 |
p. 55-71
|
artikel
|
| 65 |
Noticeboard
|
|
|
2013
|
|
1 |
p. 123-126
|
artikel
|
| 66 |
Noticeboard
|
Gans, Jeremy
|
|
2018
|
|
1 |
p. 85-86
|
artikel
|
| 67 |
Noticeboard
|
|
|
1999
|
|
1 |
p. 66-67
|
artikel
|
| 68 |
Noticeboard
|
|
|
1996
|
|
1 |
p. 76-79
|
artikel
|
| 69 |
Noticeboard
|
|
|
1998
|
|
1 |
p. 56-59
|
artikel
|
| 70 |
Noticeboard
|
Gans, Jeremy
|
|
2016
|
|
1 |
p. 83-85
|
artikel
|
| 71 |
Noticeboard
|
|
|
2001
|
|
1 |
p. 68-70
|
artikel
|
| 72 |
Noticeboard
|
|
|
2000
|
|
1 |
p. 69-72
|
artikel
|
| 73 |
Noticeboard
|
|
|
2002
|
|
1 |
p. 69-70
|
artikel
|
| 74 |
Noticeboard
|
Gans, Jeremy
|
|
2015
|
|
1 |
p. 76-79
|
artikel
|
| 75 |
Noticeboard
|
Plaxton, Michael
|
|
|
|
1 |
p. 100
|
artikel
|
| 76 |
Opinion Evidence; Admissibility of ad Hoc Expert Voice Recognition Evidence: R v Flynn
|
Warburton, Damian
|
|
2009
|
|
1 |
p. 50-57
|
artikel
|
| 77 |
Prepared Statements, Legal Advice and the Right to Silence: R v Knight
|
Choo, Andrew L.-T.
|
|
2004
|
|
1 |
p. 62-67
|
artikel
|
| 78 |
Probabilistic models of legal corroboration
|
Urbaniak, Rafal
|
|
|
|
1 |
p. 12-34
|
artikel
|
| 79 |
Probability reasoning in judicial fact-finding
|
Hunt, Ian
|
|
|
|
1 |
p. 75-94
|
artikel
|
| 80 |
Prosecution and Privilege
|
Tapper, Colin
|
|
1996
|
|
1 |
p. 5-24
|
artikel
|
| 81 |
Proving Consent in Sexual Cases: Legislative Change and Cultural Evolution
|
McEwan, Jenny
|
|
2005
|
|
1 |
p. 1-28
|
artikel
|
| 82 |
Psychological Autopsies: Legal Applications and Admissibility
|
Ormerod, David
|
|
2001
|
|
1 |
p. 1-31
|
artikel
|
| 83 |
Questions of Fact in the Practice of Law: A Response to Allen and Pardo's ‘Facts in Law and Facts of Law’
|
Kirgis, Paul F.
|
|
2004
|
|
1 |
p. 47-61
|
artikel
|
| 84 |
Review: Confession Evidence
|
Leng, Roger
|
|
1998
|
|
1 |
p. 68-70
|
artikel
|
| 85 |
Review: Evidence, Advocacy and Ethical Practice: A Criminal Trial Commentary
|
Roberts, Paul
|
|
1996
|
|
1 |
p. 92-97
|
artikel
|
| 86 |
Review: Evidence, Proof and Probability
|
Roberts, Paul
|
|
1999
|
|
1 |
p. 68-70
|
artikel
|
| 87 |
Review: Forensic Identification and Criminal Justice: Forensic Science, Justice and Risk
|
Redmayne, Mike
|
|
2008
|
|
1 |
p. 89-91
|
artikel
|
| 88 |
Review: Hearsay and Confrontation in Criminal Trials Oxford
|
Birch, Diane
|
|
1996
|
|
1 |
p. 98-101
|
artikel
|
| 89 |
Review: International Criminal Law: A Collection of International and European Instruments, the Protection of Human Rights in the Administration of Criminal Justice: A Compendium of United Nations Norms and Standards, International Criminal Law and Procedure, War Crimes in International Law
|
Roberts, Paul
|
|
1998
|
|
1 |
p. 60-68
|
artikel
|
| 90 |
Review: The Emerging System of International Criminal Law: Developments in Codification and Implementation, the Law of War Crimes: National and International Approaches
|
Roberts, Paul
|
|
2000
|
|
1 |
p. 73-76
|
artikel
|
| 91 |
Review: The Presumption of Innocence: Evidential and Human Rights Perspectives
|
Glover, Richard
|
|
2011
|
|
1 |
p. 89-92
|
artikel
|
| 92 |
Review: The Trial on Trial (Volume 1): Truth and Due Process, Litigation II: Evidence & Criminal Process
|
Hodgson, Jacqueline
|
|
2007
|
|
1 |
p. 69-73
|
artikel
|
| 93 |
R v Bradshaw
|
Hunt, Chris DL
|
|
2018
|
|
1 |
p. 68-78
|
artikel
|
| 94 |
Self-Incrimination and the Threat of Prosecution under Foreign Law: Brannigan v Davison
|
Pattenden, Rosemary
|
|
1998
|
|
1 |
p. 44-50
|
artikel
|
| 95 |
Self-Incrimination Goes to Strasbourg: O'Halloran and Francis v United Kingdom
|
Birdling, Malcolm
|
|
2008
|
|
1 |
p. 58-63
|
artikel
|
| 96 |
Silence in Court: From Common Sense to Common Law: Azzopardi
|
Leng, Roger
|
|
2002
|
|
1 |
p. 62-68
|
artikel
|
| 97 |
Surveying the Attacks on Psychiatry in the Legal Process
|
Slovenko, Ralph
|
|
1996
|
|
1 |
p. 48-75
|
artikel
|
| 98 |
Taking Epistemology Seriously: ‘Truth, Reason and Justice’ Revisited
|
Nicolson, Donald
|
|
2013
|
|
1 |
p. 1-46
|
artikel
|
| 99 |
The admissibility of an extra-curial admission by an accused as hearsay evidence against a co-accused in South Africa: Litako and others v S reconsidering S v Ndhlovu & others
|
Mujuzi, Jamil Ddamulira
|
|
2015
|
|
1 |
p. 3-10
|
artikel
|
| 100 |
The adversarial defence lawyer: Myths, disclosure and efficiency—A contemporary analysis of the role in the era of the Criminal Procedure Rules
|
Johnston, Ed
|
|
|
|
1 |
p. 35-58
|
artikel
|
| 101 |
The comparative advantages of brain-based lie detection: the P300 concealed information test and pre-trial bargaining
|
Danaher, John
|
|
2015
|
|
1 |
p. 52-66
|
artikel
|
| 102 |
The Complaining Juror: Attorney-General v Scotcher
|
Daly, Gillian
|
|
2006
|
|
1 |
p. 70-74
|
artikel
|
| 103 |
The Corroboration Requirement in Scottish Criminal Trials: Should it Be Retained for Some Forms of Problematic Evidence?
|
Davidson, Fraser P.
|
|
2014
|
|
1 |
p. 1-27
|
artikel
|
| 104 |
The Corroboration Warning in Sexual Offence Trials: Final Vestige of the Historic Suspicion of Sexual Offence Complainants or a Necessary Protection for Defendants?
|
Leahy, Susan
|
|
2014
|
|
1 |
p. 41-64
|
artikel
|
| 105 |
The detection of deception during trials: Ignoring the nonverbal communication of witnesses is not the solution—A response to Vrij and Turgeon (2018)
|
Denault, Vincent
|
|
|
|
1 |
p. 3-11
|
artikel
|
| 106 |
The discretionary death penalty for drug couriers in Singapore
|
Siyuan, Chen
|
|
2016
|
|
1 |
p. 49-71
|
artikel
|
| 107 |
The diverging dictionaries of science and law
|
Likwornik, Helena
|
|
2018
|
|
1 |
p. 30-44
|
artikel
|
| 108 |
The Evidence of Children and other Vulnerable Witnesses: A Discussion Paper: Law Commission of New Zealand, Preliminary Paper 26
|
McEwan, Jenny
|
|
1998
|
|
1 |
p. 32-36
|
artikel
|
| 109 |
The expert witness’s duty of impartiality in Canada
|
Hunt, Chris D. L.
|
|
2016
|
|
1 |
p. 72-77
|
artikel
|
| 110 |
The influence of Professor J.H. Wigmore on evidence law in Australia
|
Wilson, Nigel
|
|
2015
|
|
1 |
p. 29-51
|
artikel
|
| 111 |
The Law of Confessions in Theory and Practice: Swaffield and Pavic
|
Stone, Elizabeth
|
|
1999
|
|
1 |
p. 57-65
|
artikel
|
| 112 |
The Likelihood-Ratio Framework and Forensic Evidence in Court: A Response to R v T
|
Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart
|
|
2012
|
|
1 |
p. 1-29
|
artikel
|
| 113 |
The Next Step or Moonwalking? Expert Evidence, the Public Understanding of Science and the Case against Imwinkelried's Didactic Trial Procedures
|
Edmond, Gary
|
|
1998
|
|
1 |
p. 13-31
|
artikel
|
| 114 |
The Protection of Vulnerable Witnesses in Court: An Anglo-Dutch Comparison
|
Ellison, Louise
|
|
1999
|
|
1 |
p. 29-43
|
artikel
|
| 115 |
The Role of Gender in Judicial Decision-Making: Similar Fact Evidence, the Rose West Trial and beyond
|
Winter, Jo
|
|
2004
|
|
1 |
p. 31-46
|
artikel
|
| 116 |
The Significance of Culture in Criminal Procedure Reform: Why the Revised Disclosure Scheme Cannot Work
|
Quirk, Hannah
|
|
2006
|
|
1 |
p. 42-59
|
artikel
|
| 117 |
The Standard of Proof in Civil Cases: An Insurance Fraud Perspective
|
Hjalmarsson, Johanna
|
|
2013
|
|
1 |
p. 47-73
|
artikel
|
| 118 |
The Superfluous Rule of Evidence on Judicial Notice
|
Slovenko, Ralph
|
|
1998
|
|
1 |
p. 51-55
|
artikel
|
| 119 |
The Trouble with Teixeira: Developing a Principled Approach to Entrapment
|
Ormerod, David
|
|
2002
|
|
1 |
p. 38-61
|
artikel
|
| 120 |
The Uncertain Status of Privilege in Children Act Cases: Re L
|
McEwan, Jenny
|
|
1996
|
|
1 |
p. 80-91
|
artikel
|
| 121 |
The Use and Abuse of Psychiatric Evidence in Rape Trials
|
Ellison, Louise
|
|
2009
|
|
1 |
p. 28-49
|
artikel
|
| 122 |
Unconfirmed accelerants
|
Henneberg, Marika Linnéa
|
|
2018
|
|
1 |
p. 45-67
|
artikel
|
| 123 |
Vulnerable and Intimidated Witnesses and the Adversarial Process in England and Wales
|
Burton, Mandy
|
|
2007
|
|
1 |
p. 1-23
|
artikel
|
| 124 |
Weaknesses of Adjudication in the Face of Secret Evidence
|
Van Harten, Gus
|
|
2009
|
|
1 |
p. 1-27
|
artikel
|
Tijdschrift beschrijving