nr |
titel |
auteur |
tijdschrift |
jaar |
jaarg. |
afl. |
pagina('s) |
type |
1 |
Argumentative Delphi Surveys: Lessons for Sociological Research
|
Cuhls, Kerstin E. |
|
|
55 |
2 |
p. 120-141 |
artikel |
2 |
Consensus vs. Situated Constitutive Practices: Mapping Developments in the Role of the Expert at RAND After WWII onto Key Issues in Sociology
|
Rawls, Anne Warfield |
|
|
55 |
2 |
p. 105-119 |
artikel |
3 |
Did RAND get it Right?
|
Turner, Stephen |
|
|
55 |
2 |
p. 165-173 |
artikel |
4 |
Plenty of Traces, Limited Bearing Capacities: A Grateful Reply
|
Dayé, Christian |
|
|
55 |
2 |
p. 186-193 |
artikel |
5 |
Predictive Knowledge Infrastructures and Future-related Expertise Before the Cold War
|
Pietruska, Jamie L. |
|
|
55 |
2 |
p. 90-104 |
artikel |
6 |
The Power of Secret Knowledge: The RAND Corporation, Ignorance Studies and Sociology
|
Griessl, Lukas |
|
|
55 |
2 |
p. 155-164 |
artikel |
7 |
The Rise and Decline of Prognostics. Futures Studies, Ideology and the Sociology of Knowledge in the German Democratic Republic
|
Steinmüller, Karlheinz |
|
|
55 |
2 |
p. 142-154 |
artikel |
8 |
What’s an Expert, and Why? A comment on Christian Dayé, Experts, Social Scientists, and Techniques of Prognosis in Cold War America
|
Oreskes, Naomi |
|
|
55 |
2 |
p. 79-89 |
artikel |
9 |
“White Male Experts, Cultural Insecurity and Knowledge Production in Cold War America”
|
Brewer, Rose M. |
|
|
55 |
2 |
p. 174-185 |
artikel |