| nr |
titel |
auteur |
tijdschrift |
jaar |
jaarg. |
afl. |
pagina('s) |
type |
| 1 |
Ambiguity, trust, and the responsible conduct of research
|
Grinnell, Frederick
|
|
1999
|
5 |
2 |
p. 205-214
|
artikel
|
| 2 |
Changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. government’s attempt to define research misconduct
|
Guston, David H.
|
|
1999
|
5 |
2 |
p. 137-154
|
artikel
|
| 3 |
Commentary on “changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. government’s attempts to define research misconduct” (D.H. Guston)
|
Dale, Margaret
|
|
1999
|
5 |
2 |
p. 158-160
|
artikel
|
| 4 |
Commentary on “changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. government’s attempt to define research misconduct” (D. Guston)
|
Shipp, Allan C.
|
|
1999
|
5 |
2 |
p. 155-157
|
artikel
|
| 5 |
Commentary on "confronting misconduct in the 1980s and 1990s: What has and has not been accomplished?"
|
Friedman, Paul J.
|
|
1999
|
5 |
2 |
p. 177-178
|
artikel
|
| 6 |
Commentary on ‘Developing a federal policy on research misconduct’ (S. Francis)
|
Ryan, Kenneth J.
|
|
1999
|
5 |
2 |
p. 273-274
|
artikel
|
| 7 |
Commentary on "scientific misconduct: Present problems and future trends" (B. Mishkin)
|
Parrish, Debra M.
|
|
1999
|
5 |
2 |
p. 299-301
|
artikel
|
| 8 |
Commentary on “the fallout: What happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct?” (J.S. Lubalin and J.L. Matheson)
|
Swazey, Judith P.
|
|
1999
|
5 |
2 |
p. 251-253
|
artikel
|
| 9 |
Commentary on “The history and future of the office of research integrity: Scientific misconduct and beyond” (C. Pascal)
|
Pimple, Kenneth D.
|
|
1999
|
5 |
2 |
p. 203-204
|
artikel
|
| 10 |
Confronting misconduct in science in the 1980s and 1990s: What has and has not been accomplished?
|
Steneck, Nicholas H.
|
|
1999
|
5 |
2 |
p. 161-176
|
artikel
|
| 11 |
Developing a federal policy on research misconduct
|
Francis, Sybil
|
|
1999
|
5 |
2 |
p. 261-272
|
artikel
|
| 12 |
Development of international guidelines for research ethics
|
Kaiser, Matthias
|
|
1999
|
5 |
2 |
p. 293-298
|
artikel
|
| 13 |
Integrity in science: Moving into the new millennium
|
Chalk, Rosemary
|
|
1999
|
5 |
2 |
p. 179-182
|
artikel
|
| 14 |
Misconduct in science: Controversy and progress
|
Bird, Stephanie J.
|
|
1999
|
5 |
2 |
p. 131-136
|
artikel
|
| 15 |
Promoting responsible conduct: Striving for change rather than consensus
|
Zigmond, Michael J.
|
|
1999
|
5 |
2 |
p. 219-228
|
artikel
|
| 16 |
Scientific misconduct: Present problems and future trends
|
Mishkin, Barbara
|
|
1999
|
5 |
2 |
p. 283-292
|
artikel
|
| 17 |
Scientific misconduct: The lessons of time
|
Chubin, Daryl E.
|
|
1999
|
5 |
2 |
p. 199-202
|
artikel
|
| 18 |
Serious deviation from accepted practices
|
Buzzelli, Donald
|
|
1999
|
5 |
2 |
p. 275-282
|
artikel
|
| 19 |
The fallout: What happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct?
|
Lubalin, James S.
|
|
1999
|
5 |
2 |
p. 229-250
|
artikel
|
| 20 |
The history and future of the office of research integrity: Scientific misconduct and beyond
|
Pascal, Chris B.
|
|
1999
|
5 |
2 |
p. 183-198
|
artikel
|
| 21 |
The scientific endeavor is based on vigilance, not trust
|
King, Jonathan
|
|
1999
|
5 |
2 |
p. 215-217
|
artikel
|
| 22 |
Why fallout from whistleblowing is hard to avoid
|
Sieber, Joan E.
|
|
1999
|
5 |
2 |
p. 255-260
|
artikel
|
Tijdschrift beschrijving