| no |
title |
author |
magazine |
year |
volume |
issue |
page(s) |
type |
| 1 |
Algorithm for management of an incarcerated inguinal hernia in the emergency settings with manual reduction. Taxis, the technique and its safety
|
Pawlak, M.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1253-1258
|
article
|
| 2 |
A multi-center study on recurrent inguinal hernias: assessment of surgeons’ compliance to guideline-based repair and evaluation of short-term outcomes
|
Goh, S. S. N.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1223-1229
|
article
|
| 3 |
Clinical benefits of routine examination and synchronous repair of occult inguinal hernia during laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: a single-center experience
|
Kou, H.-W.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1317-1324
|
article
|
| 4 |
Comment on ‘Do TEP and TAPP have similar effect on postoperative pain? Author’s reply’
|
Huang, L-C
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1405-1406
|
article
|
| 5 |
Comment on: "Laparoscopic treatment (reTAPP) for recurrence after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair"
|
Wu, Jinfeng
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1399-1400
|
article
|
| 6 |
Comment to: intestinal erosions following inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review
|
D’Amore, L.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1393-1394
|
article
|
| 7 |
Comment to: intestinal erosions following inguinal hernia repair—a systematic review. Author’s reply
|
Koliakos, N.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1395-1396
|
article
|
| 8 |
Comment to: Is round ligament varicosity in pregnancy a common precursor for the later development of inguinal hernias? The prospective analysis of 28 patients over 9 years
|
Augustin, G.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1383-1384
|
article
|
| 9 |
Comment to: “Predictors of ischemic bowel in patients with incarcerated hernias”
|
Tez, M.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1381
|
article
|
| 10 |
Comment to: transrectus sheath pre-peritoneal (TREPP) procedure versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) procedure and Lichtenstein technique—a propensity-score-matched analysis in Dutch high-volume regional hospitals
|
Li, J.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1397-1398
|
article
|
| 11 |
Correction to: Inguinal hernia repair in Spain. A population-based study of 263,283 patients: factors associated with the choice of laparoscopic approach
|
Guillaumes, S.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1407-1408
|
article
|
| 12 |
Cost analysis of inguinal hernia repair: the influence of clinical and hernia-specific factors
|
Aydin, M.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1129-1135
|
article
|
| 13 |
Crossing mesh tails in the Lichtenstein repair method for medial (direct) inguinal hernia: recurrence and chronic pain rates after five years
|
Sahin, A.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1231-1238
|
article
|
| 14 |
Differences in the outcomes of scrotal vs. lateral vs. medial inguinal hernias: a multivariable analysis of registry data
|
Köckerling, F.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1169-1181
|
article
|
| 15 |
Does preoperative enhanced CT predict requirement of intestinal resection in the patients with incarcerated myopectineal hernias containing small bowel?
|
Kohga, A.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1279-1287
|
article
|
| 16 |
Do TEP and TAPP have similar effect on postoperative pain?
|
Huang, L.-C.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1401-1402
|
article
|
| 17 |
Do TEP and TAPP have similar effect on postoperative pain? Author’s reply
|
Aiolfi, A.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1403-1404
|
article
|
| 18 |
Effect of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on acid–base balance during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled study
|
Liu, Y.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1271-1277
|
article
|
| 19 |
Hemipelvectomy hernia: case series and literature review
|
Hope, W. C.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1159-1167
|
article
|
| 20 |
Hernia research in developing countries: are we looking for needles in haystacks? Surgeons in action
|
Perea del Pozo, E.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1371-1373
|
article
|
| 21 |
Improving surgical education in East Africa with a standardized hernia training program
|
Akoh, J. A.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1369-1370
|
article
|
| 22 |
Inguinal hernia repair in Spain. A population-based study of 263,283 patients: factors associated with the choice of laparoscopic approach
|
Guillaumes, S.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1345-1354
|
article
|
| 23 |
Inguinal hernia: why is it still a topic of debate?
|
Campanelli, G.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1109
|
article
|
| 24 |
Intestinal erosion rate following transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: does the surgical approach matter?
|
Apostolou, K.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1389-1390
|
article
|
| 25 |
Intestinal erosion rate following transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: does the surgical approach matter? Author’s reply
|
Koliakos, N.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1391-1392
|
article
|
| 26 |
Intestinal erosions following inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review
|
Koliakos, Nikolaos
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1137-1145
|
article
|
| 27 |
Intraoperative handling of spermatic cord lipomas during inguinal hernia repair: a nationwide survey
|
Piga, E.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1331-1337
|
article
|
| 28 |
Is the nerve in the inguinal canal really protected by an investing fascia? Is it a real entity?
|
Narita, M.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1363-1364
|
article
|
| 29 |
Laparoscopic treatment (reTAPP) for recurrence after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair
|
Fernandez-Alberti, Joaquin
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1301-1307
|
article
|
| 30 |
Local, regional, and general anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair: the importance of the study, the patient population, and surgeon’s experience
|
Yi, Bing
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1367-1368
|
article
|
| 31 |
Lower reoperation rates after open and laparoscopic groin hernia repair when performed by high-volume surgeons: a nationwide register-based study
|
Christophersen, C.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1189-1197
|
article
|
| 32 |
Mesh repair for lateral inguinal hernias: a non-evidence-based practice
|
Tripoloni, D. E.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1183-1187
|
article
|
| 33 |
More work should be done in laparo-endoscopic direct hernia repair
|
Li, J.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1365-1366
|
article
|
| 34 |
Necessary duration of follow-up to assess complications of mesh in hernia surgery: a time-lapse study based on 460 explants
|
Petersen, K.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1239-1251
|
article
|
| 35 |
Non reducible inguinal hernias in Malawi: an occupational hazard
|
Williams, B. M.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1339-1344
|
article
|
| 36 |
Open inguinal hernia repair outcomes in liver transplant recipients versus patients with cirrhosis
|
Siegel, N.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1295-1300
|
article
|
| 37 |
Outcomes of obese compared to non-obese veterans undergoing open inguinal hernia repair: a case–control study
|
Huerta, S.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1289-1294
|
article
|
| 38 |
Quality and reliability evaluation of current Internet information regarding mesh use in inguinal hernia surgery using HONcode and the DISCERN instrument
|
Fullard, Anna C.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1325-1330
|
article
|
| 39 |
Results of Shouldice hernia repair after 18 years of follow-up in all the patients
|
Martín Duce, A.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1215-1222
|
article
|
| 40 |
Robotic‐assisted single site (RASS) TAPP: an advantageous choice? Author’s reply
|
Cuccurullo, D.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1387
|
article
|
| 41 |
Safety and efficacy in inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective study comparing TREPP, TEP and Lichtenstein (SETTLE)
|
Faessen, J. L.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1309-1315
|
article
|
| 42 |
Shouldice Hospital comments on “Shouldice standard 2020: review of current literature and results of an international consensus meeting”
|
Szasz, P.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1375-1376
|
article
|
| 43 |
Shouldice standard 2020: review of the current literature and results of an international consensus meeting
|
Lorenz, R.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1199-1207
|
article
|
| 44 |
Should surgeons repair symptomatic, clinically occult, radiologically evident, inguinal hernias? A case–control study of patient-reported outcomes
|
Aly, M.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1209-1213
|
article
|
| 45 |
Surgical and non-surgical treatment of inguinal hernia during non-elective admissions in the Nationwide Readmissions Database
|
Drolshagen, H.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1259-1264
|
article
|
| 46 |
The use of biosynthetic mesh in giant hiatal hernia repair: is there a rationale? A 3-year single-center experience
|
Tartaglia, E.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1355-1361
|
article
|
| 47 |
The use of biosynthetic mesh in giant hiatal hernia repair: is there a rationale? A 3‐year single‐center experience—author’s reply
|
Tartaglia, E.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1385
|
article
|
| 48 |
The value and role of mosquito meshes in low resource and poor income settings
|
Stephenson, B. M.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1377-1378
|
article
|
| 49 |
The value and role of mosquito meshes in low resource and poor income settings: author’s reply
|
Wiessner, R.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1379-1380
|
article
|
| 50 |
Total extraperitoneal (TEP) versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernioplasty: systematic review and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials
|
Aiolfi, Alberto
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1147-1157
|
article
|
| 51 |
Transrectus sheath pre-peritoneal (TREPP) procedure versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) procedure and Lichtenstein technique: a propensity-score-matched analysis in Dutch high-volume regional hospitals
|
Zwols, T. L. R.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1265-1270
|
article
|
| 52 |
Trends in the use of patient-reported outcome measures for inguinal hernia repair: a quantitative systematic review
|
Gram-Hanssen, A.
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1111-1120
|
article
|
| 53 |
Watchful waiting vs repair for asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic inguinal hernia in men: a systematic review
|
Reistrup, Hugin
|
|
|
25 |
5 |
p. 1121-1128
|
article
|
Journal description