Digital Library
Close Browse articles from a journal
     Journal description
       All volumes of the corresponding journal
         All issues of the corresponding volume
                                       All articles of the corresponding issues
 
                             30 results found
no title author magazine year volume issue page(s) type
1 A comparison of laparoscopic and open repair of subxiphoid incisional hernias Raakow, J.
2018
22 6 p. 1083-1088
article
2 A critical review of the in vitro and in vivo models for the evaluation of anti-infective meshes Guillaume, O.
2018
22 6 p. 961-974
article
3 Causes of recurrence in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair Siddaiah-Subramanya, Manjunath
2018
22 6 p. 975-986
article
4 Comment to: Full thickness skin graft vs. synthetic mesh in the repair of giant incisional hernia: a randomized controlled multicenter study. Clay L, Stark B, Gunnarsson U, Strigård K Agarwal, P.
2018
22 6 p. 999-1000
article
5 Comment to: “Preventing parastomal hernia with modified stapled mesh stoma reinforcement technique (SMART) in patients who underwent surgery for rectal cancer: a case–control study.” By Canda AE. (Hernia. 2018 Jan 5. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1723-7. [Epub ahead of print]) Li, J.
2018
22 6 p. 1041-1042
article
6 Correction to: Causes of recurrence in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair Siddaiah-Subramanya, Manjunath
2018
22 6 p. 987
article
7 Correction to: Laparoscopic-assisted transversus abdominis plane block as an effective analgesic in total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial Mughal, A.
2018
22 6 p. 1123
article
8 EHS clinical guidelines on the management of the abdominal wall in the context of the open or burst abdomen López-Cano, M.
2018
22 6 p. 921-939
article
9 Farewell from the Hernia Editorial Team Miserez, M.
2018
22 6 p. 897-898
article
10 iBTA-induced bovine Biosheet for repair of abdominal wall defects in a beagle model: proof of concept Nakayama, Y.
2018
22 6 p. 1033-1039
article
11 Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with and without defect closure: comparative analysis of a single-institution experience with 783 patients Martin-del-Campo, Luis A.
2018
22 6 p. 1061-1065
article
12 Laparoscopic versus hybrid approach for treatment of incisional ventral hernia: a prospective randomized multicenter study of 1-month follow-up results Ahonen-Siirtola, M.
2018
22 6 p. 1015-1022
article
13 Long-term clinical, radiological, and histological follow-up after complex ventral incisional hernia repair using urinary bladder matrix graft reinforcement: a retrospective cohort study Sasse, K. C.
2018
22 6 p. 899-907
article
14 Long-term outcomes after prophylactic use of onlay mesh in midline laparotomy San Miguel, C.
2018
22 6 p. 1113-1122
article
15 Lower recurrence rate with heavyweight mesh compared to lightweight mesh in laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal (TEP) repair of groin hernia: a nationwide population-based register study Melkemichel, M.
2018
22 6 p. 989-997
article
16 Pediatric inguinal hernias, are they all the same? A proposed pediatric hernia classification and tailored treatment Shehata, Sameh
2018
22 6 p. 941-946
article
17 Pitfalls in interpretation of large registry data on hernia repair Schwab, R.
2018
22 6 p. 947-950
article
18 Preventative laparoscopic repair of Petersen’s space following gastric bypass surgery reduces the incidence of Petersen’s hernia: a comparative study Lopera, C. A.
2018
22 6 p. 1077-1081
article
19 Quality measures in ventral hernia repair: a systematic review Sun, B. J.
2018
22 6 p. 1023-1032
article
20 Reply to Comment to: Full-thickness skin graft vs. synthetic mesh in the repair of giant incisional hernia: a randomized-controlled multicenter study. P. Agarwal, D. Sharma Strigård, K.
2018
22 6 p. 1001
article
21 Reply to Comment to: Preventing parastomal hernia with modified stapled mesh stoma reinforcement technique (SMART) in patients who underwent surgery for rectal cancer: a case–control study. Li J, Zhang W Canda, A. E.
2018
22 6 p. 1043-1044
article
22 Robotic transabdominal retromuscular umbilical prosthetic hernia repair (TARUP): observational study on the operative time during the learning curve Muysoms, F.
2018
22 6 p. 1101-1111
article
23 Sirolimus-coated, poly(l-lactic acid)-modified polypropylene mesh with minimal intra-peritoneal adhesion formation in a rat model Lu, S.
2018
22 6 p. 1051-1060
article
24 Sublay repair results in superior mesh incorporation and histological fibrogenesis in comparison to onlay and primary suture in an experimental rat model Ponce Leon, F.
2018
22 6 p. 1089-1100
article
25 Surgical site infection: the “Achilles Heel” of all types of abdominal wall hernia reconstruction Tubre, D. J.
2018
22 6 p. 1003-1013
article
26 Total or partial removal of infected mesh? Invited comment Ortega-Deballon, P.
2018
22 6 p. 951-952
article
27 Treatment of giant paraesophageal hernia: pro laparoscopic approach Dallemagne, B.
2017
22 6 p. 909-919
article
28 Use of polypropylene mesh in contaminated and dirty strangulated hernias: short-term results Pandey, H.
2018
22 6 p. 1045-1050
article
29 Ventral hernia recurrence in women of childbearing age: a systematic review and meta-analysis Nouh, T.
2018
22 6 p. 1067-1075
article
30 Why we remove mesh Sharma, R.
2018
22 6 p. 953-959
article
                             30 results found
 
 Koninklijke Bibliotheek - National Library of the Netherlands