| no |
title |
author |
magazine |
year |
volume |
issue |
page(s) |
type |
| 1 |
Assessing problematic research: How can academic researchers help improve the quality of anti-crime program evaluations?
|
Lauritsen, Janet L.
|
|
2006
|
2 |
3 |
p. 363-373
|
article
|
| 2 |
Connecting the dots: Crime rates and criminal justice evaluation research
|
Rosenfeld, Richard
|
|
2006
|
2 |
3 |
p. 309-319
|
article
|
| 3 |
Effects of face-to-face restorative justice on victims of crime in four randomized, controlled trials
|
Sherman, Lawrence W.
|
|
2006
|
2 |
3 |
p. 407
|
article
|
| 4 |
Improving evaluation of anti-crime programs: Summary of a National Research Council report★
|
Lipsey, Mark
|
|
2006
|
2 |
3 |
p. 271-307
|
article
|
| 5 |
Improving impact evaluations through randomised experiments: The challenge of the National Research Council report for European criminology
|
Killias, Martin
|
|
2006
|
2 |
3 |
p. 375-391
|
article
|
| 6 |
Introduction to the special issue on the evaluation of anti-crime programs
|
Petrie, Carol
|
|
2006
|
2 |
3 |
p. 265-270
|
article
|
| 7 |
Methodological quality and the evaluation of anti-crime programs
|
Farrington, David P.
|
|
2006
|
2 |
3 |
p. 329-337
|
article
|
| 8 |
The need for evaluation research
|
Wilson, James Q.
|
|
2006
|
2 |
3 |
p. 321-328
|
article
|
| 9 |
“To develop and test:” The inventive difference between evaluation and experimentation
|
Sherman, Lawrence W.
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
p. 393-406
|
article
|
| 10 |
“To develop and test:” The inventive difference between evaluation and experimentation
|
Sherman, Lawrence W.
|
|
2006
|
2 |
3 |
p. 393-406
|
article
|
| 11 |
Towards systematic knowledge building: An anti-crime research and development continuum
|
Harrell, Adele V.
|
|
2006
|
2 |
3 |
p. 339-344
|
article
|
| 12 |
When is a bologna sandwich better than sex? A defense of small-n case study evaluations
|
Eck, John E.
|
|
2006
|
2 |
3 |
p. 345-362
|
article
|
Journal description