| no |
title |
author |
magazine |
year |
volume |
issue |
page(s) |
type |
| 1 |
Books Received
|
|
|
1997
|
42 |
3 |
p. 193-195
3 p.
|
article
|
| 2 |
Books Received
|
|
|
1997
|
42 |
3 |
p. 193-195
|
article
|
| 3 |
Conceivability, intensionality, and the logic of Anselms modal argumentfor the existence of God
|
Dale Jacquette
|
|
1997
|
42 |
3 |
p. 163-173
11 p.
|
article
|
| 4 |
Conceivability, intensionality, and the logic of Anselm's modal argument for the existence of God
|
Jacquette, Dale
|
|
1997
|
42 |
3 |
p. 163-173
|
article
|
| 5 |
Eugene Thomas Long (ed.), God, Reason and Religions: New Essays in thePhilosophy of Religion.
|
Donald Wayne Viney
|
|
1997
|
42 |
3 |
p. 187-189
3 p.
|
article
|
| 6 |
Eugene Thomas Long (ed.), God, Reason and Religions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Religion.
|
Viney, Donald Wayne
|
|
1997
|
42 |
3 |
p. 187-189
|
article
|
| 7 |
Imago Dei Imitatio Dei
|
William Power
|
|
1997
|
42 |
3 |
p. 131-141
11 p.
|
article
|
| 8 |
Imago Dei – Imitatio Dei
|
Power, William
|
|
1997
|
42 |
3 |
p. 131-141
|
article
|
| 9 |
Michael Stoeber and Hugo Meynell (eds.), Critical Reflections on theParanormal.
|
Frank B. Dilley
|
|
1997
|
42 |
3 |
p. 185-186
2 p.
|
article
|
| 10 |
Michael Stoeber and Hugo Meynell (eds.), Critical Reflections on the Paranormal.
|
Dilley, Frank B.
|
|
1997
|
42 |
3 |
p. 185-186
|
article
|
| 11 |
Mikael Stenmark, Rationality in Science, Religion and Everyday Life: ACritical Evaluation of Four Models of Rationality.
|
Michael H. Barnes
|
|
1997
|
42 |
3 |
p. 190-192
3 p.
|
article
|
| 12 |
Mikael Stenmark, Rationality in Science, Religion and Everyday Life: A Critical Evaluation of Four Models of Rationality.
|
Barnes, Michael H.
|
|
1997
|
42 |
3 |
p. 190-192
|
article
|
| 13 |
Swinburnes Tritheism
|
Edward C. Feser
|
|
1997
|
42 |
3 |
p. 175-184
10 p.
|
article
|
| 14 |
Swinburne's Tritheism
|
Feser, Edward C.
|
|
1997
|
42 |
3 |
p. 175-184
|
article
|
| 15 |
The second epistemic way revisited: Reply to ProfessorBeard's, Professor Lucas on omniscience
|
Billy Joe Lucas
|
|
1997
|
42 |
3 |
p. 143-162
20 p.
|
article
|
| 16 |
The second epistemic way revisited: Reply to Professor Beard's, ‘Professor Lucas on omniscience’
|
Lucas, Billy Joe
|
|
1997
|
42 |
3 |
p. 143-162
|
article
|
Journal description