| nr |
titel |
auteur |
tijdschrift |
jaar |
jaarg. |
afl. |
pagina('s) |
type |
| 1 |
A survey of feeding management practices and by-product feed usage on Pennsylvania dairy farms
|
Buza, M.H.
|
|
2016
|
32 |
2 |
p. 248-252
5 p.
|
artikel
|
| 2 |
Case Study: Effects of feeding fresh sugar beets to lactating dairy cows on milk production and milk composition
|
Evans, Essi
|
|
2016
|
32 |
2 |
p. 253-258
6 p.
|
artikel
|
| 3 |
Comparison of the β-agonists Actogain 45 and Optaflexx on finishing steer performance and carcass characteristics
|
Brandt Jr., R.T.
|
|
2016
|
32 |
2 |
p. 201-204
4 p.
|
artikel
|
| 4 |
Effect of fence-line or drylot weaning on the health and performance of beef calves during weaning, receiving, and finishing 1 1 Contribution no. 16-059-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station.
|
Bailey, E.A.
|
|
2016
|
32 |
2 |
p. 220-228
9 p.
|
artikel
|
| 5 |
Effect of nucleotides in milk replacers on growth and health of male dairy calves
|
Hill, T.M.
|
|
2016
|
32 |
2 |
p. 214-219
6 p.
|
artikel
|
| 6 |
Effects of a dietary organic mineral program including mannan oligosaccharides for pregnant cattle and their calves on calf health and performance
|
Gelsinger, S.L.
|
|
2016
|
32 |
2 |
p. 205-213
9 p.
|
artikel
|
| 7 |
Effects of processing treated corn stover and distillers grains on total-tract digestion and performance of growing cattle 1 1 A contribution of the University of Nebraska Agricultural Research Division, supported in part by funds provided through the Hatch Act and grant funds provided by Pellet Technology.
|
Gramkow, J.L.
|
|
2016
|
32 |
2 |
p. 183-191
9 p.
|
artikel
|
| 8 |
Fall-breeding beef females failing to conceive during spring breeding
|
Gomes da Silva, A.
|
|
2016
|
32 |
2 |
p. 243-247
5 p.
|
artikel
|
| 9 |
Influence of yeast cell wall supplementation during the finishing phase on feedlot steer performance, carcass characteristics, and postmortem tenderness
|
Aragon, S.N.
|
|
2016
|
32 |
2 |
p. 192-200
9 p.
|
artikel
|
| 10 |
Invited Review: Advantages of current and future reproductive technologies for beef cattle production 1, 2 1 Sincere appreciation is expressed to F. Ciriaco, G. de Moraes, M. Garcia, N. Oosthuizen, and T. Schulmeister for their assistance with reviewing and providing input for this manuscript. In addition, portions of the content published in this manuscript have been reprinted with kind permission from Springer Science + Business Media: Dahlen et al., 2013. 2 This article is based on a presentation by the authors in the ARPAS Symposium “Reproductive efficiency of beef cows—Current status and new technologies” at the Joint Annual Meeting of ADSA and ASAS in Orlando, Florida, July 14, 2015. Sponsorship of this publication by QualiTech and Micronutrients is appreciated. The ARPAS Foundation is also acknowledged for financial support.
|
Lamb, G.C.
|
|
2016
|
32 |
2 |
p. 162-171
10 p.
|
artikel
|
| 11 |
Invited Review: Choosing a calving date 1 1 This article is based on a presentation by the authors in the ARPAS Symposium “Reproductive efficiency of beef cows—Current status and new technologies” at the Joint Annual Meeting of ADSA and ASAS in Orlando, Florida, July 14, 2015. Sponsorship of this publication by QualiTech and Micronutrients is appreciated. The ARPAS Foundation is also acknowledged for financial support.
|
Funston, R.N.
|
|
2016
|
32 |
2 |
p. 145-153
9 p.
|
artikel
|
| 12 |
Invited Review: Nutrition and management of cows: Supplementation and feed additives 1, 2 1 A contribution of the University of Nebraska Agricultural Research Division. 2 This article is based on a presentation by the authors in the ARPAS Symposium “Reproductive efficiency of beef cows—Current status and new technologies” at the Joint Annual Meeting of ADSA and ASAS in Orlando, Florida, July 14, 2015. Sponsorship of this publication by QualiTech and Micronutrients is appreciated. The ARPAS Foundation is also acknowledged for financial support.
|
Rasby, R.J.
|
|
2016
|
32 |
2 |
p. 135-144
10 p.
|
artikel
|
| 13 |
Invited Review: Use of ultrasonography to make reproductive management decisions 1, 2 1 Mention of a trade name, proprietary product, or specific equipment does not constitute a guarantee or warranty by South Dakota State University or the USDA and does not imply approval to the exclusion of other products that may be suitable. South Dakota State University and USDA are equal opportunity providers and employers. 2 This article is based on a presentation by the authors in the ARPAS Symposium “Reproductive efficiency of beef cows—Current status and new technologies” at the Joint Annual Meeting of ADSA and ASAS in Orlando, Florida, July 14, 2015. Sponsorship of this publication by QualiTech and Micronutrients is appreciated. The ARPAS Foundation is also acknowledged for financial support.
|
Perry, G.A.
|
|
2016
|
32 |
2 |
p. 154-161
8 p.
|
artikel
|
| 14 |
Meta-analysis examining the effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation products on feedlot performance and carcass traits 1, 2, 3 1 Use of trade names in this publication does not imply endorsement by Colorado State University or the authors or criticisms of similar products not mentioned. 2 Mention of a proprietary product does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the products by Colorado State University or the authors and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that may also be suitable. 3 Partial sponsorship of this study was provided by Diamond V, Cedar Rapids, IA 52404.
|
Wagner, J.J.
|
|
2016
|
32 |
2 |
p. 172-182
11 p.
|
artikel
|
| 15 |
The effect of weaning regimen on behavioral and production responses of beef calves
|
Wiese, B.I.
|
|
2016
|
32 |
2 |
p. 229-235
7 p.
|
artikel
|
| 16 |
Usage and attitudes of water conservation on Ontario dairy farms
|
Robinson, A.D.
|
|
2016
|
32 |
2 |
p. 236-242
7 p.
|
artikel
|
Tijdschrift beschrijving