| nr |
titel |
auteur |
tijdschrift |
jaar |
jaarg. |
afl. |
pagina('s) |
type |
| 1 |
A comparison of 2 implant protocols—Synovex-Choice/Synovex-Plus versus Synovex-S/Revalor-S—on steer feedlot performance and carcass characteristics
|
Nielson, H.R.
|
|
2016
|
32 |
1 |
p. 63-66
|
artikel
|
| 2 |
Case Study: Effect of strategic ration balancing on the efficiency of milk protein production and environmental impact of dairy cows in a commercial herd
|
Chen, Yanting
|
|
2016
|
32 |
1 |
p. 115-133
|
artikel
|
| 3 |
Case Study: Frequency of visits to a mineral feeder by steers grazing wheat pasture 1
|
Smith, S.C.
|
|
2016
|
32 |
1 |
p. 106-109
|
artikel
|
| 4 |
Case Study: Lying behavior of dairy cows presented with different cubicle arrangements
|
Bach, A.
|
|
2016
|
32 |
1 |
p. 110-114
|
artikel
|
| 5 |
Effect of anise oil fed to lactating sows and nursery pigs on sow feed intake, piglet performance, and weanling pig feed intake and growth performance 1 1 Approved for publication by the director of the Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station as Publ. No. 2015-230-22599
|
Charal, J.W.
|
|
2016
|
32 |
1 |
p. 99-105
|
artikel
|
| 6 |
Effect of increasing initial implant dosage on feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of long-fed steer and heifer calves 1 1 A contribution of the University of Nebraska Agricultural Research Division, supported in part by funds provided through the Hatch Act. , 2 2 Funding provided by Merck Animal Health (De Soto, KS). 3 Adams Land and Cattle Co, Broken Bow, NE 68822.
|
Hilscher Jr., F.H.
|
|
2016
|
32 |
1 |
p. 53-62
|
artikel
|
| 7 |
Effects of feeding generic ractopamine (Actogain) with or without the combination of monensin and tylosin phosphate on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and tenderness of finishing steers
|
Bohrer, B.M.
|
|
2016
|
32 |
1 |
p. 42-52
|
artikel
|
| 8 |
Effects of growth promoting implant strategies on performance of pre- and postweaned beef calves
|
Jones, H. Brad
|
|
2016
|
32 |
1 |
p. 74-81
|
artikel
|
| 9 |
Efficacy of the 5-day CO-Synch ovulation synchronization protocol with or without the inclusion of exogenous progesterone in beef cows
|
Gunn, P.J.
|
|
2016
|
32 |
1 |
p. 82-89
|
artikel
|
| 10 |
Influence of timing of growth implant administration on performance and health of newly received beef cattle 1 , 2 1 Use of trade names in this publication does not imply endorsement by Colorado State University or the authors nor criticisms of similar products not mentioned. 2 Mention of a proprietary product does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the products by Colorado State University or the authors and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that may also be suitable.
|
Neuhold, K.L.
|
|
2016
|
32 |
1 |
p. 67-73
|
artikel
|
| 11 |
Invited Review: Designing a grazing experiment that can reliably detect meaningful differences 1 1 This review article is based on a presentation by the authors in the symposium “Design, Analysis, and Execution of Quality Grazing Research” at the meeting of the American Society of Animal Science Southern Section, February 1, 2015, Atlanta, Georgia, in conjunction with the SERA-41 Beef Cattle Forage Utilization Group and the South Central Chapter of the American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists. Appreciation is expressed to the symposium sponsors: The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Elanco Animal Health—Stocker District, Vigortone, and Barenbrug USA. Publication of this manuscript was sponsored by Elanco Animal Health—Stocker District.
|
Reuter, R.R.
|
|
2016
|
32 |
1 |
p. 19-30
|
artikel
|
| 12 |
Invited Review: Getting more information from your grazing research beyond cattle performance 1 1 This review article is based on a presentation by the authors in the symposium “Design, Analysis, and Execution of Quality Grazing Research” at the meeting of the American Society of Animal Science Southern Section, February 1, 2015, Atlanta, Georgia, in conjunction with the SERA-41 Beef Cattle Forage Utilization Group and the South Central Chapter of American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists. Appreciation is expressed to the symposium sponsors: The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Elanco Animal Health—Stocker District, Vigortone, and Barenbrug USA. , 2 2 Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the USDA. All programs and services of the USDA are offered on a nondiscriminatory basis without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, marital status, or handicap.
|
Gunter, Stacey A.
|
|
2016
|
32 |
1 |
p. 31-41
|
artikel
|
| 13 |
Invited Review: Grazing management options in meeting objectives of grazing experiments 1 2
|
Aiken, G.E.
|
|
2016
|
32 |
1 |
p. 1-9
|
artikel
|
| 14 |
Invited Review: The roles of forage management, forage quality, and forage allowance in grazing research 1 1 This review article is based on a presentation by the author in the symposium “Design, Analysis, and Execution of Quality Grazing Research” at the meeting of the American Society of Animal Science Southern Section, February 1, 2015, Atlanta, Georgia, in conjunction with the SERA-41 Beef Cattle Forage Utilization Group and the South Central Chapter of the American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists. Appreciation is expressed to the symposium sponsors: The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Elanco Animal Health—Stocker District, Vigortone, and Barenbrug USA.
|
Rouquette Jr., F.M.
|
|
2016
|
32 |
1 |
p. 10-18
|
artikel
|
| 15 |
Production practices and value of artificial insemination and estrus synchronization programs of United States beef producers
|
Johnson, S.K.
|
|
2016
|
32 |
1 |
p. 90-98
|
artikel
|
Tijdschrift beschrijving