| nr |
titel |
auteur |
tijdschrift |
jaar |
jaarg. |
afl. |
pagina('s) |
type |
| 1 |
A response to “Word choice matters: Comment on Stoutenborough et al., 2016, ‘Is “fracking” a new dirty word?’”
|
Stoutenborough, James W.
|
|
2016
|
20 |
C |
p. 10-13
4 p.
|
artikel
|
| 2 |
Can the Polish shale gas dog still bark? Politics and policy of unconventional hydrocarbons in Poland
|
Godzimirski, Jakub M.
|
|
2016
|
20 |
C |
p. 158-167
10 p.
|
artikel
|
| 3 |
Comparing the relationship between knowledge and support for hydraulic fracturing between residents of the United States and the United Kingdom
|
Stedman, Richard C.
|
|
2016
|
20 |
C |
p. 142-148
7 p.
|
artikel
|
| 4 |
Conceptualizing the above ground factors in shale gas: Toward a research agenda on regulatory governance
|
Goldthau, Andreas
|
|
2016
|
20 |
C |
p. 73-81
9 p.
|
artikel
|
| 5 |
Delineating property rights in unconventional hydrocarbon resources: Concepts from the United States and Germany
|
Hanschel, Dirk
|
|
2016
|
20 |
C |
p. 149-157
9 p.
|
artikel
|
| 6 |
Editorial Board
|
|
|
2016
|
20 |
C |
p. IFC-
1 p.
|
artikel
|
| 7 |
Fee disbursements and the local acceptance of unconventional gas development: Insights from Pennsylvania
|
Paydar, Naveed H.
|
|
2016
|
20 |
C |
p. 31-44
14 p.
|
artikel
|
| 8 |
Is gas perceived as sustainable? Insights from value-driven evaluations in the Netherlands
|
Perlaviciute, Goda
|
|
2016
|
20 |
C |
p. 55-62
8 p.
|
artikel
|
| 9 |
Looking through the prism of shale gas development: Towards a holistic framework for analysis
|
Lozano-Maya, Juan Roberto
|
|
2016
|
20 |
C |
p. 63-72
10 p.
|
artikel
|
| 10 |
Observations on risks, the social sciences, and unconventional hydrocarbons
|
Centner, Terence J.
|
|
2016
|
20 |
C |
p. 1-7
7 p.
|
artikel
|
| 11 |
Quiet voices in the fracking debate: Ambivalence, nonmobilization, and individual action in two extractive communities (Saskatchewan and Pennsylvania)
|
Eaton, Emily
|
|
2016
|
20 |
C |
p. 22-30
9 p.
|
artikel
|
| 12 |
Scale matters: Variation in perceptions of shale gas development across national, state, and local levels
|
Evensen, Darrick
|
|
2016
|
20 |
C |
p. 14-21
8 p.
|
artikel
|
| 13 |
Shale gas extraction, precaution and prevention: A conversation on regulatory responses
|
Fleming, Ruven C.
|
|
2016
|
20 |
C |
p. 131-141
11 p.
|
artikel
|
| 14 |
The evolution of shale gas development and energy security in Poland: Presenting a hierarchical choice of priorities
|
Adamus, Wiktor
|
|
2016
|
20 |
C |
p. 168-178
11 p.
|
artikel
|
| 15 |
To frack or not to frack: Perceptions of the risks and opportunities of high-volume hydraulic fracturing in the United States
|
Kreuze, Amanda
|
|
2016
|
20 |
C |
p. 45-54
10 p.
|
artikel
|
| 16 |
Trusting in the future: The re-emergence of state trust funds in the shale era
|
Rabe, Barry G.
|
|
2016
|
20 |
C |
p. 117-127
11 p.
|
artikel
|
| 17 |
Unconventional gas developments and the politics of risk and knowledge in Australia
|
Espig, Martin
|
|
2016
|
20 |
C |
p. 82-90
9 p.
|
artikel
|
| 18 |
Unconventional risks: The experience of acute energy development in the Eagle Ford Shale
|
Ellis, Colter
|
|
2016
|
20 |
C |
p. 91-98
8 p.
|
artikel
|
| 19 |
Universities in contentious energy debates—Science, democracy and coal seam gas in Australia
|
Hardie, Liz
|
|
2016
|
20 |
C |
p. 105-116
12 p.
|
artikel
|
| 20 |
US presidential candidates’ views on unconventional gas and oil: Who has it right?
|
Evensen, Darrick
|
|
2016
|
20 |
C |
p. 128-130
3 p.
|
artikel
|
| 21 |
Who governs local hydrocarbon development? Evidence from the Marcellus Shale in the United States
|
Kostandini, Genti
|
|
2016
|
20 |
C |
p. 99-104
6 p.
|
artikel
|
| 22 |
Word choice matters: Comment on Stoutenborough et al., 2016, ‘Is “fracking” a new dirty word?’
|
Evensen, Darrick
|
|
2016
|
20 |
C |
p. 8-9
2 p.
|
artikel
|
Tijdschrift beschrijving