| no |
title |
author |
magazine |
year |
volume |
issue |
page(s) |
type |
| 1 |
Bringing transparency into the process: Social network analysis as a tool to support the participatory design and implementation process of Payments for Ecosystem Services
|
Schröter, Barbara
|
|
2018
|
34 |
PB |
p. 206-217
|
article
|
| 2 |
Citizens’ perspectives on marine protected areas as a governance strategy to effectively preserve marine ecosystem services and biodiversity
|
Tonin, Stefania
|
|
2018
|
34 |
PB |
p. 189-200
|
article
|
| 3 |
Involving multiple actors in ecosystem service governance: Exploring the role of stated preference valuation
|
Lienhoop, Nele
|
|
2018
|
34 |
PB |
p. 181-188
|
article
|
| 4 |
Learning on ecosystem services co-production in decision-making from role-playing simulation: Comparative analysis from Southeast Europe
|
Gissi, Elena
|
|
2018
|
34 |
PB |
p. 228-253
|
article
|
| 5 |
Methods in ecosystem services governance analysis: An introduction
|
Sattler, Claudia
|
|
2018
|
34 |
PB |
p. 155-168
|
article
|
| 6 |
Playing before paying? A PES simulation game for assessing power inequalities and motivations in the governance of Ecosystem Services
|
Merlet, Pierre
|
|
2018
|
34 |
PB |
p. 218-227
|
article
|
| 7 |
Qualitative comparative institutional analysis of environmental governance: Implications from research on payments for ecosystem services
|
Meyer, Claas
|
|
2018
|
34 |
PB |
p. 169-180
|
article
|
| 8 |
Spatially explicit framed field experiments on ecosystem services governance
|
Rommel, Jens
|
|
2018
|
34 |
PB |
p. 201-205
|
article
|
| 9 |
Zoning does not improve the availability of ecosystem services in urban watersheds. A case study from Upstate South Carolina, USA
|
Brown, Melanie G.
|
|
2018
|
34 |
PB |
p. 254-265
|
article
|
Journal description