Digitale Bibliotheek
Sluiten Bladeren door artikelen uit een tijdschrift
     Tijdschrift beschrijving
       Alle jaargangen van het bijbehorende tijdschrift
         Alle afleveringen van het bijbehorende jaargang
                                       Alle artikelen van de bijbehorende aflevering
 
                             26 gevonden resultaten
nr titel auteur tijdschrift jaar jaarg. afl. pagina('s) type
1 A new classification of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses was developed and ranked according to the severity Yavchitz, Amélie
2016
75 C p. 56-65
10 p.
artikel
2 Automatically quantifying the scientific quality and sensationalism of news records mentioning pandemics: validating a maximum entropy machine-learning model Hoffman, Steven J.
2016
75 C p. 47-55
9 p.
artikel
3 Brief alcohol intervention trials conducted by higher prestige authors and published in higher impact factor journals are cited more frequently Tanner-Smith, Emily E.
2016
75 C p. 119-125
7 p.
artikel
4 Can we measure ‘Sensationalisim’ and ‘Spin’? Tugwell, Peter
2016
75 C p. A6-A8
nvt p.
artikel
5 Compliance with prospective trial registration guidance remained low in high-impact journals and has implications for primary end point reporting Dal-Ré, Rafael
2016
75 C p. 100-107
8 p.
artikel
6 Conclusiveness resolves the conflict between quality of evidence and imprecision in GRADE Anttila, Sten
2016
75 C p. 1-5
5 p.
artikel
7 Current use was established and Cochrane guidance on selection of social theories for systematic reviews of complex interventions was developed Noyes, Jane
2016
75 C p. 78-92
15 p.
artikel
8 Diverse criteria and methods are used to compare treatment effect estimates: a scoping review Brignardello-Petersen, Romina
2016
75 C p. 29-39
11 p.
artikel
9 Editorial Board 2016
75 C p. IFC-
1 p.
artikel
10 Empirical evaluation demonstrated importance of validating biomarkers for early detection of cancer in screening settings to limit the number of false-positive findings Chen, Hongda
2016
75 C p. 108-114
7 p.
artikel
11 GRADE guidelines system is reproducible when instructions are clearly operationalized even among the guidelines panel members with limited experience with GRADE Kumar, Ambuj
2016
75 C p. 115-118
4 p.
artikel
12 Improved incidence estimates from linked vs. stand-alone electronic health records Millett, Elizabeth R.C.
2016
75 C p. 66-69
4 p.
artikel
13 Interpreting GRADE's levels of certainty or quality of the evidence: GRADE for statisticians, considering review information size or less emphasis on imprecision? Schünemann, Holger J.
2016
75 C p. 6-15
10 p.
artikel
14 Lacking portability of therapeutic effects: the hierarchy of internal validity is insufficient—A response to Hans J. Trampisch Walach, Harald
2016
75 C p. 129-131
3 p.
artikel
15 Pathophysiology and clinical trials have limitations in some areas of medicine: focus on psychiatry (letter commenting: J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(4):361–363.) de Leon, Jose
2016
75 C p. 126-127
2 p.
artikel
16 Poor record linkage sensitivity biased outcomes in a linked cohort analysis Moore, Cecilia L.
2016
75 C p. 70-77
8 p.
artikel
17 Portability of therapeutic effects (letter commenting: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(11):1251--1260.) Trampisch, Hans J.
2016
75 C p. 129-
1 p.
artikel
18 PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement McGowan, Jessie
2016
75 C p. 40-46
7 p.
artikel
19 Reply to Dr. Leon: true but unrelated Prasad, Vinay
2016
75 C p. 127-
1 p.
artikel
20 Strong heterogeneity of outcome reporting in systematic reviews Sautenet, Bénédicte
2016
75 C p. 93-99
7 p.
artikel
21 Table of Contents 2016
75 C p. A3-A5
nvt p.
artikel
22 The authors' reply to letter to the editor re: Bagherzadeh-Khiabani et al., J Clin Epi, 2015 Bagherzadeh-Khiabani, Farideh
2016
75 C p. 131-132
2 p.
artikel
23 There is no hierarchy in the first place—a comment on Jürgen Windeler Walach, Harald
2016
75 C p. 128-129
2 p.
artikel
24 There is no reverse hierarchy (letter commenting: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(11):1251--1260.) Windeler, Jürgen
2016
75 C p. 127-128
2 p.
artikel
25 Thirty percent of abstracts presented at dental conferences are published in full: a systematic review Hua, Fang
2016
75 C p. 16-28
13 p.
artikel
26 We should not be so quick to abandon the use of domain experts and full models (letter commenting: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;71C:76--85.) Kattan, Michael W.
2016
75 C p. 131-
1 p.
artikel
                             26 gevonden resultaten
 
 Koninklijke Bibliotheek - Nationale Bibliotheek van Nederland