| nr |
titel |
auteur |
tijdschrift |
jaar |
jaarg. |
afl. |
pagina('s) |
type |
| 1 |
A framework for effective collaboration between specialist and broad-spectrum groups for delivering priority Cochrane reviews
|
Handoll, Helen H.
|
|
2013
|
66 |
5 |
p. 490-495
6 p.
|
artikel
|
| 2 |
An equity lens can ensure an equity-oriented approach to agenda setting and priority setting of Cochrane Reviews
|
Nasser, Mona
|
|
2013
|
66 |
5 |
p. 511-521
11 p.
|
artikel
|
| 3 |
Attrition in a longitudinal study with hard-to-reach participants was reduced by ongoing contact
|
David, Michael C.
|
|
2013
|
66 |
5 |
p. 575-581
7 p.
|
artikel
|
| 4 |
Case study: A patient–clinician collaboration that identified and prioritized evidence gaps and stimulated research development
|
Buckley, Brian S.
|
|
2013
|
66 |
5 |
p. 483-489
7 p.
|
artikel
|
| 5 |
Condition-specific measure was more responsive than generic measure in colorectal cancer: all but social domains
|
Wong, Carlos K.
|
|
2013
|
66 |
5 |
p. 557-565
9 p.
|
artikel
|
| 6 |
Development and pilot test of a process to identify research needs from a systematic review
|
Saldanha, Ian J.
|
|
2013
|
66 |
5 |
p. 538-545
8 p.
|
artikel
|
| 7 |
Editorial Board
|
|
|
2013
|
66 |
5 |
p. IFC-
1 p.
|
artikel
|
| 8 |
Effective stakeholder participation in setting research priorities using a Global Evidence Mapping approach
|
Clavisi, Ornella
|
|
2013
|
66 |
5 |
p. 496-502.e2
49705 p.
|
artikel
|
| 9 |
Ensuring relevance for Cochrane reviews: evaluating processes and methods for prioritizing topics for Cochrane reviews
|
Nasser, Mona
|
|
2013
|
66 |
5 |
p. 474-482
9 p.
|
artikel
|
| 10 |
Evidence in agenda setting: new directions for the Cochrane Collaboration
|
Nasser, Mona
|
|
2013
|
66 |
5 |
p. 469-471
3 p.
|
artikel
|
| 11 |
Many scenarios exist for selective inclusion and reporting of results in randomized trials and systematic reviews
|
Page, Matthew J.
|
|
2013
|
66 |
5 |
p. 524-537
14 p.
|
artikel
|
| 12 |
Methods for setting priorities in systematic reviews
|
Tugwell, Peter
|
|
2013
|
66 |
5 |
p. 467-468
2 p.
|
artikel
|
| 13 |
Prevention and self-management interventions are top priorities for osteoarthritis systematic reviews
|
Jaramillo, Alejandra
|
|
2013
|
66 |
5 |
p. 503-510.e4
5.099498E6 p.
|
artikel
|
| 14 |
Prioritization of systematic reviews leads prioritization of research gaps and needs
|
Nasser, Mona
|
|
2013
|
66 |
5 |
p. 522-523
2 p.
|
artikel
|
| 15 |
Sensibility of five at-work productivity measures was endorsed by patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis
|
Tang, Kenneth
|
|
2013
|
66 |
5 |
p. 546-556
11 p.
|
artikel
|
| 16 |
Statistical methods for the meta-analysis of diagnostic tests must take into account the use of surrogate standards
|
Kang, Jian
|
|
2013
|
66 |
5 |
p. 566-574.e1
5175 p.
|
artikel
|
| 17 |
Table of Contents
|
|
|
2013
|
66 |
5 |
p. A3-A4
nvt p.
|
artikel
|
| 18 |
The Cochrane Collaboration review prioritization projects show that a variety of approaches successfully identify high-priority topics
|
Bero, Lisa A.
|
|
2013
|
66 |
5 |
p. 472-473
2 p.
|
artikel
|
Tijdschrift beschrijving