| no |
title |
author |
magazine |
year |
volume |
issue |
page(s) |
type |
| 1 |
A systematic review of studies reporting the development of core outcome sets for use in routine care
|
Kearney, Anna
|
|
|
158 |
C |
p. 34-43
|
article
|
| 2 |
Authors arbitrarily used methodological approaches to analyze the quality of reporting in research reports: a meta-research study
|
Plenkovic, Mia
|
|
|
158 |
C |
p. 53-61
|
article
|
| 3 |
Bypassing phase 2 in cancer drug development erodes the risk/benefit balance in phase 3 trials
|
Moyer, Hannah
|
|
|
158 |
C |
p. 134-140
|
article
|
| 4 |
CONSORT Harms 2022 statement, explanation, and elaboration: updated guideline for the reporting of harms in randomized trials
|
Junqueira, Daniela R.
|
|
|
158 |
C |
p. 149-165
|
article
|
| 5 |
COVID-19 trials were not more likely to report intent to share individual data than non-COVID-19 trials in ClinicalTrials.gov
|
Ramdjee, Bruno
|
|
|
158 |
C |
p. 10-17
|
article
|
| 6 |
Development of an international glossary for clinical guidelines collaboration
|
Christensen, Rachel E.
|
|
|
158 |
C |
p. 84-91
|
article
|
| 7 |
Editorial Board
|
|
|
|
158 |
C |
p. IFC
|
article
|
| 8 |
Editor's choice – June 2023
|
Tricco, Andrea C.
|
|
|
158 |
C |
p. A1-A2
|
article
|
| 9 |
Elicited clinician knowledge did not improve dementia risk prediction in individuals with mild cognitive impairment
|
Wang, Meng
|
|
|
158 |
C |
p. 111-118
|
article
|
| 10 |
Empirical evaluation of the methods used in systematic reviews including observational studies and randomized trials
|
Cheurfa, Cherifa
|
|
|
158 |
C |
p. 44-52
|
article
|
| 11 |
GRADE guidance 36: updates to GRADE's approach to addressing inconsistency
|
Guyatt, Gordon
|
|
|
158 |
C |
p. 70-83
|
article
|
| 12 |
In Cochrane nutrition reviews assessment of dietary adherence varied considerably
|
Schwingshackl, Lukas
|
|
|
158 |
C |
p. 1-9
|
article
|
| 13 |
Intracluster correlation coefficients from school-based cluster randomized trials of interventions for improving health outcomes in pupils
|
Parker, Kitty
|
|
|
158 |
C |
p. 18-26
|
article
|
| 14 |
Irish funder guidance increased searching for, and uptake of, core outcome sets
|
Beecher, Claire
|
|
|
158 |
C |
p. 92-98
|
article
|
| 15 |
Item response theory assumptions were adequately met by the Oxford hip and knee scores
|
Harrison, Conrad J.
|
|
|
158 |
C |
p. 166-176
|
article
|
| 16 |
Item response theory may account for unequal item weighting and individual-level measurement error in trials that use PROMs: a psychometric sensitivity analysis of the TOPKAT trial
|
Harrison, Conrad J.
|
|
|
158 |
C |
p. 62-69
|
article
|
| 17 |
Patient participation impacts outcome domain selection in core outcome sets for research: an updated systematic review
|
Dodd, Susanna
|
|
|
158 |
C |
p. 127-133
|
article
|
| 18 |
Practical guide to the typical analysis of prognostic factors and biomarkers without the use of P-values
|
Jin, Yuxuan
|
|
|
158 |
C |
p. 179-184
|
article
|
| 19 |
Presentation approaches for enhancing interpretability of patient-reported outcomes in meta-analyses: a systematic survey of Cochrane reviews
|
Zeng, Linan
|
|
|
158 |
C |
p. 119-126
|
article
|
| 20 |
Quality of surgical patient-reported outcome measure validation studies is often deficient: a systematic review
|
Uimonen, Mikko
|
|
|
158 |
C |
p. 27-33
|
article
|
| 21 |
Reporting standards for child health research were few and poorly implemented
|
Li, Qinyuan
|
|
|
158 |
C |
p. 141-148
|
article
|
| 22 |
Should authors of overviews of systematic reviews invite the authors of the systematic reviews they analyzed to re-evaluate or validate their methodological analysis?
|
Faggion Jr., Clovis Mariano
|
|
|
158 |
C |
p. 177-178
|
article
|
| 23 |
Systematic review finds “spin” practices and poor reporting standards in studies on machine learning-based prediction models
|
Andaur Navarro, Constanza L.
|
|
|
158 |
C |
p. 99-110
|
article
|
| 24 |
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
158 |
C |
p. ii-iv
|
article
|
Journal description