Digitale Bibliotheek
Sluiten Bladeren door artikelen uit een tijdschrift
     Tijdschrift beschrijving
       Alle jaargangen van het bijbehorende tijdschrift
         Alle afleveringen van het bijbehorende jaargang
                                       Alle artikelen van de bijbehorende aflevering
 
                             31 gevonden resultaten
nr titel auteur tijdschrift jaar jaarg. afl. pagina('s) type
1 A call for error management in academic clinical research McLennan, Stuart

154 C p. 208-211
artikel
2 A multicenter prospective study validated a nomogram to predict individual risk of dependence in ambulation after rehabilitation Bernardini, Bruno

154 C p. 97-107
artikel
3 A rapid priority setting exercise combining existing, emergent evidence with stakeholder knowledge identified broad topic uncertainties O'Connor, Nicole

154 C p. 178-187
artikel
4 A scoping review finds that guides to authors of protocols for observational epidemiological studies varied highly in format and content Malmsiø, Daniel

154 C p. 156-166
artikel
5 A systematic scoping review of just-in-time, adaptive interventions finds limited automation and incomplete reporting Oikonomidi, Theodora

154 C p. 108-116
artikel
6 Challenges with defining a meta-epidemiological study as “study in which the unit of analysis is a study, not a patient”: author’s reply Puljak, Livia

154 C p. 220-221
artikel
7 Challenges with need to improve the reference standard in diagnosis: paper 2: real-world case examples from GRADE for when a reference standard is not clearly defined/ easily replicable or when it is infeasible/ unethical to perform the reference standard Mustafa, Reem A.

154 C p. 206-207
artikel
8 Challenges with need to improve the reference standard in diagnosis: paper 3: response to mustafa and schunemann Reed, Martin H.

154 C p. 216-217
artikel
9 Challenges with need to improve the reference standard in diagnosis paper 4: response to reed Mustafa, Reem A.

154 C p. 218
artikel
10 Clinical trial data-sharing policies among journals, funding agencies, foundations, and other professional organizations: a scoping review Johnson, Austin L.

154 C p. 42-55
artikel
11 Complete case logistic regression with a dichotomised continuous outcome led to biased estimates Cornish, Rosaleen Peggy

154 C p. 33-41
artikel
12 Considering multiple outcomes with different weights informed the hierarchy of interventions in network meta-analysis Mavridis, Dimitris

154 C p. 188-196
artikel
13 Controversy and debate: challenges with the need to improve the reference standard in diagnosis paper 1: two challenges: absence of a clear cut, easily replicable test for the reference standard; unethical/infeasible inclusion of an invasive procedure in the reference standard Reed, Martin H.

154 C p. 204-205
artikel
14 Decision criteria for selecting essential medicines and their connection to guidelines: an interpretive descriptive qualitative interview study Piggott, Thomas

154 C p. 146-155
artikel
15 Distributions of baseline categorical variables were different from the expected distributions in randomized trials with integrity concerns Bolland, Mark J.

154 C p. 117-124
artikel
16 Editorial Board
154 C p. IFC
artikel
17 Flexible approaches to clinical trials Tricco, Andrea C.

154 C p. A1-A2
artikel
18 Improving grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation evidence tables part 4: a three-arm noninferiority randomized trial demonstrates improved understanding of content in summary of findings tables with a new format Morgan, Rebecca L.

154 C p. 125-135
artikel
19 Imputing missing laboratory results may return erroneous values because they are not missing at random van Walraven, Carl

154 C p. 65-74
artikel
20 Indicators of questionable research practices were identified in 163,129 randomized controlled trials Damen, Johanna A.

154 C p. 23-32
artikel
21 “Meta-epidemiological study” is a study in which the unit of analysis is a study, not a patient; response to Puljak et al. Kataoka, Yuki

154 C p. 219-220
artikel
22 Minimal reporting improvement after peer review in reports of COVID-19 prediction models: systematic review Hudda, Mohammed T.

154 C p. 75-84
artikel
23 Most systematic reviews that used the term “update” in title/abstract were not an updated version Runjic, Renata

154 C p. 1-7
artikel
24 No short-term mortality from benzodiazepine use post-acute ischemic stroke after accounting for bias Moura, Lidia M.V.R.

154 C p. 136-145
artikel
25 Recalibration of prediction model was needed for monitoring health care quality in subgroups: a retrospective cohort study Endo, Hideki

154 C p. 56-64
artikel
26 Reporting according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses for abstracts (PRISMA-A) depends on abstract length Helbach, Jasmin

154 C p. 167-177
artikel
27 Reporting quality was suboptimal in a systematic review of randomized controlled trials with adaptive designs Purja, Sujata

154 C p. 85-96
artikel
28 Systematic review identifies the design and methodological conduct of studies on machine learning-based prediction models Andaur Navarro, Constanza L.

154 C p. 8-22
artikel
29 Table of Contents
154 C p. ii-v
artikel
30 The GIN-McMaster guideline tool extension for the integration of quality improvement and quality assurance in guidelines: a description of the methods for its development Piggott, Thomas

154 C p. 197-203
artikel
31 The Global Evidence Commission's report provided a wake-up call for the evidence community Stewart, Ruth

154 C p. 212-215
artikel
                             31 gevonden resultaten
 
 Koninklijke Bibliotheek - Nationale Bibliotheek van Nederland