Digital Library
Close Browse articles from a journal
     Journal description
       All volumes of the corresponding journal
         All issues of the corresponding volume
                                       All articles of the corresponding issues
 
                             51 results found
no title author magazine year volume issue page(s) type
1 A systematic survey identified methodological issues in studies estimating anchor-based minimal important differences in patient-reported outcomes Wang, Yuting

142 C p. 144-151
article
2 Believing in black boxes: machine learning for healthcare does not need explainability to be evidence-based McCoy, Liam G.

142 C p. 252-257
article
3 BNT162b2 vaccine effectiveness was marginally affected by the SARS-CoV-2 beta variant in fully vaccinated individuals Mor, Orna

142 C p. 38-44
article
4 Causal analyses of existing databases: the importance of understanding what can be achieved with your data before analysis (commentary on Hernán) Morris, Tim P.

142 C p. 261-263
article
5 Challenges of evidence synthesis during the 2020 COVID pandemic: a scoping review Khalil, Hanan

142 C p. 10-18
article
6 Change in healthcare during Covid-19 pandemic was assessed through observational designs Corrao, Giovanni

142 C p. 45-53
article
7 Commentary on controversy and debate 4 paper series: Questionable utility of the relative risk in clinical research Wells, George A.

142 C p. 268-270
article
8 Controversy and Debate: Questionable utility of the relative risk in clinical research: Paper 1: A call for change to practice Doi, Suhail A.

142 C p. 271-279
article
9 Controversy and Debate: Questionable utility of the relative risk in clinical research: Paper 2: Is the Odds Ratio “portable” in meta-analysis? Time to consider bivariate generalized linear mixed model Xiao, Mengli

142 C p. 280-287
article
10 Controversy and Debate : Questionable utility of the relative risk in clinical research: Paper 4 :Odds Ratios are far from “portable” — A call to use realistic models for effect variation in meta-analysis Xiao, Mengli

142 C p. 294-304
article
11 Editorial Board
142 C p. IFC
article
12 Editors' Choice: February 2022 Tovey, David

142 C p. A6-A7
article
13 Estimates of minimal clinically important improvments vary with the responsiveness of the sample Ward, Michael M.

142 C p. 110-118
article
14 Estimating total morbidity burden of COVID-19: relative importance of death and disability Smith, Maia P.

142 C p. 54-59
article
15 European non-commercial sponsors showed substantial variation in results reporting to the EU trial registry Dal-Ré, Rafael

142 C p. 161-170
article
16 Extensive variability of work participation outcomes measured in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review Ravinskaya, Margarita

142 C p. 60-99
article
17 Feasibility of national living guideline methods: The Australian Stroke Guidelines Hill, Kelvin

142 C p. 184-193
article
18 GRADE guidance 24 optimizing the integration of randomized and non-randomized studies of interventions in evidence syntheses and health guidelines Cuello-Garcia, Carlos A.

142 C p. 200-208
article
19 Guidelines developed under pressure. The case of the COVID-19 low-quality “rapid” guidelines and potential solutions Florez, Ivan D.

142 C p. 194-199
article
20 International alliance and AGREE-ment of 71 clinical practice guidelines on the management of critical care patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review Amer, Yasser S.

142 C p. 333-370
article
21 Interrater reliability of ROB2 – an alternative measure and way of categorization Loef, Martin

142 C p. 326-327
article
22 Kappa and AC1/2 statistics: beyond the paradox Minozzi, Silvia

142 C p. 328-329
article
23 Let's end “real-world evidence” terminology usage: A study should be identified by its design Pacheco, Rafael Leite

142 C p. 249-251
article
24 Methods used to select results to include in meta-analyses of nutrition research: A meta-research study Kanukula, Raju

142 C p. 171-183
article
25 Missing data is poorly handled and reported in prediction model studies using machine learning: a literature review Nijman, SWJ

142 C p. 218-229
article
26 Missing trials in drug regulatory dossiers may have good reasons, but should be predefined and transparent Leufkens, Hubert G.

142 C p. 258-260
article
27 Mortality prediction in intensive care units including premorbid functional status improved performance and internal validity Moser, André

142 C p. 230-241
article
28 Prediction models: stepwise development and simultaneous validation is a step back Heinze, Georg

142 C p. 330-331
article
29 Reassembling the fragility index: a demonstration of statistical reasoning Baer, Benjamin R.

142 C p. 317-318
article
30 Replicability in the context of systematic reviews: A call for a framework with considerations regarding duplication, overlap, and intentionality Puljak, Livia

142 C p. 313-314
article
31 Resource use during systematic review production varies widely: a scoping review: authors’ reply Nussbaumer-Streit, B

142 C p. 321-322
article
32 Resource use during systematic review production varies widely: a scoping review: response to Nussbaumer-Streit et al. Morales-Plaza, Cristhian D.

142 C p. 319-320
article
33 Rethinking Table 1 Horwitz, Ralph I.

142 C p. 242-245
article
34 Sequential multiple assignment randomized trial studies should report all key components: a systematic review Bigirumurame, Theophile

142 C p. 152-160
article
35 Sex and Gender Appraisal Tool-Systematic Reviews-2 and Participation-To-Prevalence Ratio assessed to whom the evidence applies in sepsis reviews Antequera, A

142 C p. 119-132
article
36 Small differences in EQ-5D-5L health utility scores were interpreted differently between and within respondents McClure, Nathan S.

142 C p. 133-143
article
37 Stepwise model development and simultaneous validation to keep up with clinically relevant and rapidly changing diagnostic techniques Haalboom, M

142 C p. 332
article
38 Table of Contents
142 C p. A2-A5
article
39 The certainty of the evidence in oral health has not improved according to GRADE: a meta-epidemiological study Seehra, Jadbinder

142 C p. 29-37
article
40 The difference between evidence-based medicine, evidence-based (clinical) practice, and evidence-based health care Puljak, Livia

142 C p. 311-312
article
41 The fragility index should not be used for sample size calculations in clinical trials Potter, Gail E

142 C p. 315-316
article
42 The inclusion of outcomes in search strategies for Cochrane Reviews: authors’ reply Tsujimoto, Yasushi

142 C p. 324-325
article
43 The inclusion of outcomes in search strategies for Cochrane Reviews: response to Tsujimoto et al Verbeek, Jos

142 C p. 323
article
44 The methodological quality was low and conclusions discordant for meta-analyses comparing proximal humerus fracture treatments: a meta-epidemiological study Sandau, Nicolai

142 C p. 100-109
article
45 The methodology of a “living” COVID-19 registry development in a clinical context Arienti, Chiara

142 C p. 209-217
article
46 The Odds Ratio is “portable” across baseline risk but not the Relative Risk: Time to do away with the log link in binomial regression Doi, Suhail A.

142 C p. 288-293
article
47 The use of GRADE approach in Cochrane reviews of TCM was insufficient: a cross-sectional survey Wang, Qi

142 C p. 1-9
article
48 Transparency: A central principle underpinning trustworthy guidelines Ford, Nathan

142 C p. 246-248
article
49 Tutorial on directed acyclic graphs Digitale, Jean C.

142 C p. 264-267
article
50 Use of core outcome sets was low in clinical trials published in major medical journals Matvienko-Sikar, Karen

142 C p. 19-28
article
51 Using a stepwise approach to simultaneously develop and validate machine learning based prediction models Haalboom, M.

142 C p. 305-310
article
                             51 results found
 
 Koninklijke Bibliotheek - National Library of the Netherlands