Digitale Bibliotheek
Sluiten Bladeren door artikelen uit een tijdschrift
     Tijdschrift beschrijving
       Alle jaargangen van het bijbehorende tijdschrift
         Alle afleveringen van het bijbehorende jaargang
                                       Alle artikelen van de bijbehorende aflevering
 
                             47 gevonden resultaten
nr titel auteur tijdschrift jaar jaarg. afl. pagina('s) type
1 Assessing concordance of financial conflicts of interest disclosures with payments’ databases: a systematic survey of the health literature El-Rayess, Hebah

127 C p. 19-28
artikel
2 Authors of clinical trials seldom reported details when declaring their individual and institutional financial conflicts of interest: a cross-sectional survey Hakoum, Maram B.

127 C p. 49-58
artikel
3 Authors' response to comments on “The 1960s cervical screening incident at National Women's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand: insights for screening research, policy making, and practice” Raffle, Angela E.

127 C p. 237-240
artikel
4 Cervical screening and overdiagnosis: continuation of Controversy and Debate Tugwell, Peter

127 C p. A8-A10
artikel
5 Citation impact was highly variable for reporting guidelines of health research: a citation analysis Caulley, Lisa

127 C p. 96-104
artikel
6 Cochrane Centralised Search Service showed high sensitivity identifying randomized controlled trials: A retrospective analysis Noel-Storr, A.H.

127 C p. 142-150
artikel
7 Commentary: Back to the future in cervical screening: applying a contemporary lens to an old controversy Weller, David Paul

127 C p. 218-219
artikel
8 Commentary: Quest for using sound evidence when making decisions about screening Santesso, Nancy

127 C p. 220-222
artikel
9 Commentary: Screening: righting a wrong in Auckland Carrell, Robin W.

127 C p. 223-224
artikel
10 Controversy and debate on credibility ceilings. Paper 4: Credibility ceilings da capo Ioannidis, John P.A.

127 C p. 217
artikel
11 Controversy and debate on credibility ceilings. Paper 3: errors in the statistical justification for the “credibility ceiling” method remain uncorrected Mathur, Maya B.

127 C p. 214-216
artikel
12 Controversy and debate on credibility ceilings. Paper 1: Fundamental problems with the “credibility ceiling” method for meta-analyses Mathur, Maya B.

127 C p. 208-210
artikel
13 Controversy and debate on credibility ceilings. Paper 2: Using credibility ceilings to explore skepticism about observational evidence Ioannidis, John P.A.

127 C p. 211-213
artikel
14 Delphi consensus on core criteria set selecting among health-related outcome measures (HROM) in primary health care Santaguida, Pasqualina L.

127 C p. 105-116
artikel
15 Describing deprescribing trials better: an elaboration of the CONSORT statement Blom, Jeanet W.

127 C p. 87-95
artikel
16 Different meanings of equipoise and the four quadrants of uncertainty Shamy, Michel

127 C p. 248-249
artikel
17 Editorial Board
127 C p. IFC
artikel
18 Editors Epilogue; Looking back and forward in the arena of screening, overdiagnosis, and optimizing outcome: editors’ epilogue Knottnerus, J. André

127 C p. 244-245
artikel
19 Evidence of survival benefit was often ambiguous in randomized trials of cancer treatments Perneger, Thomas V.

127 C p. 1-8
artikel
20 Fragility index of network meta-analysis with application to smoking cessation data Xing, Aiwen

127 C p. 29-39
artikel
21 Guidelines in Low and Middle Income Countries Paper 3: Appraisal of Philippine Clinical Practice Guidelines using Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II: improvement needed for rigor, applicability, and editorial independence Dans, Leonila F.

127 C p. 184-190
artikel
22 Guidelines in Low and Middle Income Countries Paper 2: Quality assessment of Chilean guidelines: need for improvement in rigor, applicability, updating, and patients’ inclusion Loezar, Cristóbal

127 C p. 177-183
artikel
23 Guidelines in Low and Middle Income Countries Paper 1: Scoping clinical practice guidelines in Chile and the Philippines Dans, Antonio L.

127 C p. 175-176
artikel
24 Letter to the editor Paul, Charlotte

127 C p. 225-227
artikel
25 Letter to the editor: A clinician's perspective of the ‘unfortunate experiment’ Jones, Ronald W.

127 C p. 229-230
artikel
26 Letter to the editor: Expert evidence vs. expert opinion Overton, Helen

127 C p. 228
artikel
27 Letter to the editor: Herb green medal Baird, Tony

127 C p. 231
artikel
28 Letter to the editor: The 1960s cervical screening incident at National Women's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand Skegg, David C.G.

127 C p. 235-236
artikel
29 Letter to the editor: Women's experience of ‘the unfortunate experiment’ at National Women's Hospital, New Zealand Coney, Sandra

127 C p. 232-234
artikel
30 Limited reliability of experts’ assessment of telephone triage in primary care patients with chest discomfort Erkelens, Daphne C.

127 C p. 117-124
artikel
31 Meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy could not be reproduced Stegeman, Inge

127 C p. 161-166
artikel
32 Meta-analysis of noninferiority and equivalence trials: ignoring trial design leads to differing and possibly misleading conclusions Acuna, Sergio A.

127 C p. 134-141
artikel
33 Over half of the WHO guidelines published from 2014 to 2019 explicitly considered health equity issues: a cross-sectional survey Dewidar, Omar

127 C p. 125-133
artikel
34 Publisher's note regarding “the short-form chronic respiratory disease questionnaire was a valid, reliable, and responsive quality-of-life instrument in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease” [J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:489-497]
127 C p. 250
artikel
35 Quality assessment of prevalence studies: a systematic review Migliavaca, Celina Borges

127 C p. 59-68
artikel
36 Redundant meta-analyses are common in genetic epidemiology Sigurdson, Matthew K.

127 C p. 40-48
artikel
37 Response to comments by defenders of the inquiry into the management of cervical carcinoma in situ in National Women's Hospital, New Zealand, in the 1960s and early 1970s Chalmers, Iain

127 C p. 241-243
artikel
38 Risk of bias assessment of test comparisons was uncommon in comparative accuracy systematic reviews: an overview of reviews Yang, Bada

127 C p. 167-174
artikel
39 SAS macros for creating demographics tables Granche, Janeway

127 C p. 246-247
artikel
40 Social media can have an impact on how we manage and investigate the COVID-19 pandemic Cuello-Garcia, Carlos

127 C p. 198-201
artikel
41 Statistical process control assessed implementation fidelity of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine care Roberts, Natasha A.

127 C p. 76-86
artikel
42 Table of Contents
127 C p. A3-A7
artikel
43 Time to health-related quality of life improvement analysis was developed to enhance evaluation of modern anticancer therapies Cottone, Francesco

127 C p. 9-18
artikel
44 Toward a framework for the design, implementation, and reporting of methodology scoping reviews Martin, Glen P.

127 C p. 191-197
artikel
45 Using GRADE in situations of emergencies and urgencies: certainty in evidence and recommendations matters during the COVID-19 pandemic, now more than ever and no matter what Schünemann, Holger J.

127 C p. 202-207
artikel
46 Using subdomain-specific item sets affected PROMIS physical function scores differently in cardiology and rheumatology patients Liegl, Gregor

127 C p. 151-160
artikel
47 Using the full PICO model as a search tool for systematic reviews resulted in lower recall for some PICO elements Frandsen, Tove Faber

127 C p. 69-75
artikel
                             47 gevonden resultaten
 
 Koninklijke Bibliotheek - Nationale Bibliotheek van Nederland