Digitale Bibliotheek
Sluiten Bladeren door artikelen uit een tijdschrift
     Tijdschrift beschrijving
       Alle jaargangen van het bijbehorende tijdschrift
         Alle afleveringen van het bijbehorende jaargang
                                       Alle artikelen van de bijbehorende aflevering
 
                             19 gevonden resultaten
nr titel auteur tijdschrift jaar jaarg. afl. pagina('s) type
1 A common framework of steps and criteria for prioritizing topics for evidence syntheses: a systematic review Fadlallah, Racha

120 C p. 67-85
artikel
2 An approach to explore for a sweet spot in randomized trials Redelmeier, Donald A.

120 C p. 59-66
artikel
3 A systematic review evaluating screening instruments for gambling disorder finds lack of adequate evidence Otto, Jean Lin

120 C p. 86-93
artikel
4 A validation study revealed differences in design and performance of MEDLINE search filters for qualitative research Wagner, Mandy

120 C p. 17-24
artikel
5 Cancer screening programs should incorporate values and preferences of potential participants Knottnerus, Bart J.

120 C p. 123
artikel
6 Collection of antirheumatic medication data from both patients and rheumatologists shows strong agreement in a real-world clinical cohort: methodological issues to avoid misinterpretation Sabour, Siamak

120 C p. 121-122
artikel
7 Conflict of interest as ethical shorthand: understanding the range and nature of “non-financial conflict of interest” in biomedicine Grundy, Quinn

120 C p. 1-7
artikel
8 Editorial Board
120 C p. IFC
artikel
9 Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) notes: extremely serious, GRADE's terminology for rating down by three levels Piggott, Thomas

120 C p. 116-120
artikel
10 Group sample sizes in nonregulated health care intervention trials described as randomized controlled trials were overly similar Thombs, Brett D.

120 C p. 8-16
artikel
11 Inter-review agreement of risk-of-bias judgments varied in Cochrane reviews Könsgen, Nadja

120 C p. 25-32
artikel
12 No clear choice between Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies to assess methodological quality in cross-sectional studies of health-related quality of life and breast cancer Moskalewicz, Alexandra

120 C p. 94-103
artikel
13 Proportion of published primary health care protocols with published results in subsequent papers was decreasing Staikos, Ioannis

120 C p. 40-46
artikel
14 Quality of therapeutic drug monitoring guidelines is suboptimal: an evaluation using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument Zeng, Min

120 C p. 47-58
artikel
15 Response to the letter to the editor by Sabour et al. (2019) Re: “Collection of antirheumatic medication data from both patients and rheumatologists shows strong agreement in a real-world clinical cohort: Methodological issues to avoid misinterpretation” Movahedi, Mohammad

120 C p. 122-123
artikel
16 Systematic review finds that appraisal tools for medical research studies address conflicts of interest superficially Lundh, Andreas

120 C p. 104-115
artikel
17 Table of Contents
120 C p. A3-A4
artikel
18 The trials within cohorts design facilitated efficient patient enrollment and generalizability in oncology setting Couwenberg, Alice M.

120 C p. 33-39
artikel
19 Trials embedded in cohorts, registries, and health care databases are gaining ground Knottnerus, J. André

120 C p. A5-A6
artikel
                             19 gevonden resultaten
 
 Koninklijke Bibliotheek - Nationale Bibliotheek van Nederland