| nr |
titel |
auteur |
tijdschrift |
jaar |
jaarg. |
afl. |
pagina('s) |
type |
| 1 |
A combined theoretical and empirical approach to evidence quality evaluation: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright
|
Jones, Andrew
|
|
|
210 |
C |
p. 74-76
|
artikel
|
| 2 |
After the experimental turn: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright
|
Sampson, Robert J.
|
|
|
210 |
C |
p. 67-69
|
artikel
|
| 3 |
Benefits and limitations of randomized controlled trials: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright
|
Gelman, Andrew
|
|
|
210 |
C |
p. 48-49
|
artikel
|
| 4 |
Challenging the hegemony of randomized controlled trials: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright
|
Pearl, Judea
|
|
|
210 |
C |
p. 60-62
|
artikel
|
| 5 |
Editorial Board
|
|
|
|
210 |
C |
p. ii
|
artikel
|
| 6 |
Evidence, policy and politics: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright
|
Drèze, Jean
|
|
|
210 |
C |
p. 45-47
|
artikel
|
| 7 |
Introduction. What works? And for whom?
|
Horwitz, Ralph I.
|
|
|
210 |
C |
p. 22-25
|
artikel
|
| 8 |
Mechanisms and uncertainty in randomized controlled trials: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright
|
Suzuki, Etsuji
|
|
|
210 |
C |
p. 83-85
|
artikel
|
| 9 |
On randomized experimentation in education: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright, in honor of Frederick Mosteller
|
Raudenbush, Stephen W.
|
|
|
210 |
C |
p. 63-66
|
artikel
|
| 10 |
Randomization, randomized trials, and analyses using observational data: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright
|
Dahabreh, Issa J.
|
|
|
210 |
C |
p. 41-44
|
artikel
|
| 11 |
Randomized clinical trials and personalized medicine: A commentary on deaton and cartwright
|
Schork, Nicholas J.
|
|
|
210 |
C |
p. 71-73
|
artikel
|
| 12 |
Randomized controlled trials and evidence-based policy: A multidisciplinary dialogue
|
Mowat, Ryan
|
|
|
210 |
C |
p. 1
|
artikel
|
| 13 |
Randomized controlled trials: Often flawed, mostly useless, clearly indispensable: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright
|
Ioannidis, John P.A.
|
|
|
210 |
C |
p. 53-56
|
artikel
|
| 14 |
Randomized trials and evidence in medicine: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright
|
Concato, John
|
|
|
210 |
C |
p. 32-36
|
artikel
|
| 15 |
Reflections on Randomized Control Trials
|
Deaton, Angus
|
|
|
210 |
C |
p. 86-90
|
artikel
|
| 16 |
Selection bias in population-representative studies? A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright
|
Schooling, C. Mary
|
|
|
210 |
C |
p. 70
|
artikel
|
| 17 |
The “average” treatment effect: A construct ripe for retirement. A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright
|
Subramanian, S.V.
|
|
|
210 |
C |
p. 77-82
|
artikel
|
| 18 |
The potential role for sociologists in designing RCTs and of RCTs in refining sociological theory: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright
|
Bonell, Chris
|
|
|
210 |
C |
p. 29-31
|
artikel
|
| 19 |
The trials of randomized control: Probability, intuition and the dinosaur risk. A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright
|
Basu, Kaushik
|
|
|
210 |
C |
p. 26-28
|
artikel
|
| 20 |
The tribulations of trials: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright
|
Oakes, J. Michael
|
|
|
210 |
C |
p. 57-59
|
artikel
|
| 21 |
Twenty-six assumptions that have to be met if single random assignment experiments are to warrant “gold standard” status: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright
|
Cook, Thomas D.
|
|
|
210 |
C |
p. 37-40
|
artikel
|
| 22 |
Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials
|
Deaton, Angus
|
|
|
210 |
C |
p. 2-21
|
artikel
|
| 23 |
Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright
|
Imbens, Guido
|
|
|
210 |
C |
p. 50-52
|
artikel
|
Tijdschrift beschrijving