| no |
title |
author |
magazine |
year |
volume |
issue |
page(s) |
type |
| 1 |
Epilogue: Four Lessons from Evaluating Controversial Programs
|
Knickman, James
|
|
1997
|
19 |
7 |
p. 607-614
8 p.
|
article
|
| 2 |
Nonexperimental Designs and Program Evaluation*
*
The evaluation study described in this article was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The authors are solely responsible for the research results and the views expressed in this article.
|
Kisker, Ellen Eliason
|
|
1997
|
19 |
7 |
p. 541-566
26 p.
|
article
|
| 3 |
Sex Education and Abstinence: Programs and Evaluation
|
Besharov, Douglas J
|
|
1997
|
19 |
7 |
p. 501-506
6 p.
|
article
|
| 4 |
The Advantages of Experimental Designs for Evaluating Sex Education Programs*
*
Substantial portions of this paper are adapted from Metcalf (1996)and Metcalf and Thornton (1992), that address similar topics in slightly different contexts.
|
Metcalf, Charles E.
|
|
1997
|
19 |
7 |
p. 507-523
17 p.
|
article
|
| 5 |
Thinking Through Evaluation Design Options
|
Devaney, Barbara
|
|
1997
|
19 |
7 |
p. 587-606
20 p.
|
article
|
| 6 |
Trade-Offs in Designing a Social Program Experiment
|
Dynarski, Mark
|
|
1997
|
19 |
7 |
p. 525-540
16 p.
|
article
|
| 7 |
Using Self Reports to Measure Program Impact*
*
Portions of this article are based on a paper presented at the conference Researching Sexual Behavior: Methodological Issues, which was held on April 26–28, 1996, at the University of Indiana. The National Survey of Adolescent Males has been supported by grants from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
|
Sonenstein, Freya L.
|
|
1997
|
19 |
7 |
p. 567-585
19 p.
|
article
|
Journal description