Digitale Bibliotheek
Sluiten Bladeren door artikelen uit een tijdschrift
 
<< vorige    volgende >>
     Tijdschrift beschrijving
       Alle jaargangen van het bijbehorende tijdschrift
         Alle afleveringen van het bijbehorende jaargang
           Alle artikelen van de bijbehorende aflevering
                                       Details van artikel 8 van 12 gevonden artikelen
 
 
  Letters To The Editor: Rebuttal to Ottomanelli et al. Methods of a multisite randomized clinical trial of supported employment among veterans with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(7):919-30.
 
 
Titel: Letters To The Editor: Rebuttal to Ottomanelli et al. Methods of a multisite randomized clinical trial of supported employment among veterans with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(7):919-30.
Auteur: Marcel Dijkers, PhD
Verschenen in: Journal of rehabilitation research and development
Paginering: Jaargang 47 (2010) nr. 5 pagina's vii-viii
Jaar: 2010
Inhoud: Probably no fashion has gripped first medicine; then the rest of health care; and finally social services, vocational rehabilitation, education, and other professional fields as quickly and deeply as evidence-based practice (EBP). There have been claims that there is nothing new here, that professionals have always been required to base treatment of their patients/clients on evidence as to what are effective, efficient, and reliable methods of diagnosing/assessing, treating, or offering prognosis, and have done so. However, the core message of EBP has been a worthwhile one whatever one thinks of that claim: not any odd piece of evidence will do. To provide patients/clients with optimal service, one needs to base it on a systematic study of the most recent and most appropriate evidence, carefully evaluated for potential biases and errors. Probably as a result of the prominence of the originators of EBP in medicine, as well as the appealing and easy quantitative and mathematical approaches to evidence evaluation, EBP is now a bandwagon few people dare to disdain publicly. In fact, adding the label "evidence-based" to about anything and everything done professionally is seen as a way of giving it a modern, up-to-date, scientific cachet that will appeal to other professionals, if not patents/clients. EBP has become a holy cow to whom tribute is due.
Uitgever: Rehabilitation Research and Development Service, Department of Veterans Affairs (provided by DOAJ)
Bronbestand: Elektronische Wetenschappelijke Tijdschriften
 
 

                             Details van artikel 8 van 12 gevonden artikelen
 
<< vorige    volgende >>
 
 Koninklijke Bibliotheek - Nationale Bibliotheek van Nederland