include_once 'Zend/View/Helper/HeadMeta.php'; include_once 'Zend/View/Helper/HeadScript.php'; include_once 'Zend/View/Helper/HeadStyle.php'; include_once 'Zend/View/Helper/Translate.php'; include_once 'Zend/View/Helper/Url.php'; include_once 'Zend/View/Helper/Layout.php'; include_once 'Zend/Controller/Action/Helper/ViewRenderer.php'; include_once 'Zend/Filter/Word/CamelCaseToDash.php'; include_once 'Zend/Filter/StringToLower.php'; include_once 'Zend/View/Helper/Placeholder.php'; include_once 'Zend/View/Helper/HeadTitle.php'; include_once 'Zend/View/Helper/HeadLink.php'; IBL Tool - Digital Library
  Digital Library
Close Browse articles from a journal
 
<< previous    next >>
     Journal description
       All volumes of the corresponding journal
         All issues of the corresponding volume
           All articles of the corresponding issues
                                       Details for article 2 of 9 found articles
 
 
  Crisis or Creation? A Systematic Examination of False Memory Syndrome
 
 
Title: Crisis or Creation? A Systematic Examination of False Memory Syndrome
Author: Dallam, Stephanie J.
Appeared in: Journal of child sexual abuse
Paging: Volume 9 (2002) nr. 3-4 pages 9-36
Year: 2002-03-11
Contents: In 1992, the False Memory Syndrome Foundation (FMSF), an advocacy organization for people claiming to be falsely accused of sexual abuse, announced the discovery of a new syndrome involving iatrogenically created false memories of childhood sexual abuse. This article critically examines the assumptions underlying “False Memory Syndrome” to determine whether there is sufficient empirical evidence to support it as a valid diagnostic construct. Epidemiological evidence is also examined to determine whether there is data to support its advocates' claim of a public health crisis or epidemic. A review of the relevant literature demonstrates that the existence of such a syndrome lacks general acceptance in the mental health field, and that the construct is based on a series of faulty assumptions, many of which have been scientifically disproven. There is a similar lack of empirical validation for claims of a “false memory” epidemic. It is concluded that in the absence of any substantive scientific support, “False Memory Syndrome” is best characterized as a pseudoscientific syndrome that was developed to defend against claims of child abuse.
Publisher: Routledge
Source file: Elektronische Wetenschappelijke Tijdschriften
 
 

                             Details for article 2 of 9 found articles
 
<< previous    next >>
 
 Koninklijke Bibliotheek - National Library of the Netherlands