Digital Library
Close Browse articles from a journal
 
<< previous    next >>
     Journal description
       All volumes of the corresponding journal
         All issues of the corresponding volume
           All articles of the corresponding issues
                                       Details for article 3 of 5 found articles
 
 
  Perceptions of the “Mind-Cancer” Relationship Among the Public, Cancer Patients, and Oncologists
 
 
Title: Perceptions of the “Mind-Cancer” Relationship Among the Public, Cancer Patients, and Oncologists
Author: Lemon, Jim
Edelman, Sarah
Kidman, Antony D.
Appeared in: Journal of psychosocial oncology
Paging: Volume 21 (2004) nr. 4 pages 43-58
Year: 2004-08-04
Contents: The view that psychological factors play a role in the onset and progression of cancer has been promoted widely in the popular media. The present study assessed the prevalence of this view. The respondents-527 members of the public, 239 cancer patients, and 117 medical practitioners working in oncologycompleted a survey questionnaire consisting of three questions in a yes/no format on whether they believed psychological factors can affect the cause, progression, and cure of cancer. Each question was followed by a Likert-scale question asking respondents to estimate the strength of such an effect. The majority of respondents in the public sample endorsed the proposition that psychological factors affect cause (60%), progression (71%), and cure (72%). A larger proportion of patients endorsed the proposition for progression (85%) and cure (86%). Oncologists were less likely to endorse it for cause (12%) and cure (26%). These relationships also held for estimates of the strength of the effect. In the public sample, females and respondents with a university education provided higher estimates of the effects of psychological factors on cancer. These differences were not evident in the patient sample. Given that the scientific evidence to support the “mind-cancer” view is equivocal, the question of whether these perceptions should be challenged needs to be addressed.
Publisher: Routledge
Source file: Elektronische Wetenschappelijke Tijdschriften
 
 

                             Details for article 3 of 5 found articles
 
<< previous    next >>
 
 Koninklijke Bibliotheek - National Library of the Netherlands