|
| << vorige | volgende >> |
Tijdschrift beschrijving
Alle jaargangen van het bijbehorende tijdschrift
Alle afleveringen van het bijbehorende jaargang
Alle artikelen van de bijbehorende aflevering
Details van artikel 5 van 6 gevonden artikelen
| Titel: |
Response to Clemans |
| Auteur: |
Yen, Wendy M. Burket, George R. Fitzpatrick, Anne R. |
| Verschenen in: |
Educational assessment |
| Paginering: | Jaargang 3 (1995) nr. 2 pagina's 181-190 |
| Jaar: |
1995-04-01 |
| Inhoud: |
Clemans (1993) argued that the use of item response theory (IRT) to vertically scale Form E of the California Achievement Tests produces inappropriate results. In this response we show that (a) Cleman's analysis of school district data was incomplete, inconsistent, and did not follow good measurement practice; (b) the simulation he conducted was unfairly stacked against IRT, was unrealistic, and ignored other realistic published simulations that demonstrated the accuracy of IRT scaling procedures; (c) his "common sense" evaluations of student performance ignored basic facts about the measurement of student achievement; and (d) the concerns expressed in his article were irrelevant to the vast majority of uses of norm-referenced tests. |
| Uitgever: |
Routledge |
| Bronbestand: |
Elektronische Wetenschappelijke Tijdschriften |
Details van artikel 5 van 6 gevonden artikelen
| << vorige | volgende >> |