Moral Education in Early Childhood: The Limits of Constructivism
Titel:
Moral Education in Early Childhood: The Limits of Constructivism
Auteur:
Goodman, Joan F.
Verschenen in:
Early education and development
Paginering:
Jaargang 11 (2000) nr. 1 pagina's 37-54
Jaar:
2000-02-01
Inhoud:
Broadly speaking there are two polar views on moral education - traditionalism and progressivism. Traditionalists tend to believe that moral values are eternal and universal. They prioritize such "hard" virtues as discipline, courage, restraint, and obedience, and believe in directive behavioral instruction with meaningful consequences for rule-following and rule-breaking. Progressives, the dominant voice in early childhood education, believe that moral values are variable, dependent on social context. They prioritize such "soft" virtues as unselfishness, caring, generosity, and tolerance, and believe virtues are acquired in a "sociomoral environment" of nurturing adults who stress cooperative interchanges and minimal authority. While most programs, despite their "tilt," acknowledge the need for a balance, they do not specify criteria for making the pedagogical decisions. Without such explicit criteria, a "strong" version of constructivism may demand more of children than they can deliver given their developmental limitations. Two criteria are suggested for determining when traditional methods may usefully supplement constructivist ones: First, one must decide if the matter at stake is a bottom-line non-negotiable value such that a child's dissension is unacceptable. Second, one must determine if the preschooler, given her cognitive egocentricity, moral realism, and "romancing of reality" can make a rational (decentered) choice. There follows a more detailed discussion of blended approaches (traditional and constructivist) within the overall goal of helping children build a moral identity.
Tijdschrift beschrijving