Digitale Bibliotheek
Sluiten Bladeren door artikelen uit een tijdschrift
 
<< vorige    volgende >>
     Tijdschrift beschrijving
       Alle jaargangen van het bijbehorende tijdschrift
         Alle afleveringen van het bijbehorende jaargang
           Alle artikelen van de bijbehorende aflevering
                                       Details van artikel 3 van 4 gevonden artikelen
 
 
  DO PEER GUIDELINES OR EDITORIAL POLICIES AFFECT THE REPORTING AND DISCUSSION OF RACE AND ETHNICITY IN PEDIATRIC RESEARCH?
 
 
Titel: DO PEER GUIDELINES OR EDITORIAL POLICIES AFFECT THE REPORTING AND DISCUSSION OF RACE AND ETHNICITY IN PEDIATRIC RESEARCH?
Auteur: Ackerman, Paul D.
Kelly, Michael L.
Walsh, Catherine A.
Ross, Lainie Friedman
Verschenen in: Accountability in research
Paginering: Jaargang 12 (2005) nr. 1 pagina's 17-31
Jaar: 2005-03
Inhoud: Objectives Two policy statements published in pediatric journals encouraged researchers not to use race and ethnicity [R/E] to explain cohort differences without collecting and analyzing data that examine the potential underlying social mechanisms. We sought to determine if these statements had any impact on the reporting and discussion of R/E and sociodemographic markers [SM]. Methods Articles in three general pediatric journals between July 2002 and June 2003 were reviewed, and were compared with previously collected data from July 1999-June 2000. We recorded whether the articles documented R/E or SM, or both, in the results, and whether they discussed their significance. Researchers were surveyed to determine whether and why they collected R/E data. Results Race was reported in 156 of 228 articles (68%), but discussed in only one-third (75). Although there is wide interjournal variability, there was little change between the two periods. Seventy-two percent of respondents thought that R/E was or might be relevant to their research, and this influenced their decision to report and discuss R/E. Conclusions Most researchers report R/E and believe it is relevant to their research. Despite policies that reject R/E as explanatory variables, most researchers do not report or discuss the underlying social mechanisms that may explain R/E differences.
Uitgever: Taylor & Francis
Bronbestand: Elektronische Wetenschappelijke Tijdschriften
 
 

                             Details van artikel 3 van 4 gevonden artikelen
 
<< vorige    volgende >>
 
 Koninklijke Bibliotheek - Nationale Bibliotheek van Nederland