|
| << vorige | volgende >> |
Tijdschrift beschrijving
Alle jaargangen van het bijbehorende tijdschrift
Alle afleveringen van het bijbehorende jaargang
Alle artikelen van de bijbehorende aflevering
Details van artikel 11 van 13 gevonden artikelen
| Titel: |
Methodology might matter, but Weintraub's meta-Methodology shouldn't |
| Auteur: |
Maki, Uskali |
| Verschenen in: |
Journal of economic methodology |
| Paginering: | Jaargang 1 (1994) nr. 2 pagina's 215-232 |
| Jaar: |
1994-12 |
| Inhoud: |
The paper questions Weintraub's thesis that 'Methodology doesn't matter'. It is argued that the thesis is unclear, and when clarified on the basis of textual evidence from Weintraub himself, it is false (or else trivially true). It is also pointed out that Weintraub's argument for the thesis is based on what he denounces, namely 'Methodology' (of a second degree); it turns out to be a 'Methodological' argument against 'Methodology'. The thesis also gives a distorted picture of what many methodologists of economics actually are doing. On the other hand, Weintraub's arguments for why the history of economic thought might matter also apply to much of economic methodology. It is concluded that methodology might matter. |
| Uitgever: |
Routledge |
| Bronbestand: |
Elektronische Wetenschappelijke Tijdschriften |
Details van artikel 11 van 13 gevonden artikelen
| << vorige | volgende >> |