Digital Library
Close Browse articles from a journal
 
<< previous    next >>
     Journal description
       All volumes of the corresponding journal
         All issues of the corresponding volume
           All articles of the corresponding issues
                                       Details for article 28 of 40 found articles
 
 
  Selection among open population capture-recapture models when capture probabilities are heterogeneous
 
 
Title: Selection among open population capture-recapture models when capture probabilities are heterogeneous
Author: Burnham, K. P.
Anderson, D. R.
White, G. C.
Appeared in: Journal of applied statistics
Paging: Volume 22 (1995) nr. 5-6 pages 611-624
Year: 1995-11-01
Contents: Selection of a parsimonious model as a basis for statistical inference from capture-recapture data is critical, especially when using open models in the analysis of multiple, interrelated data sets (e.g. males and females, with two to three age classes, over three to five areas and 10-15 years). The global (i.e. most general) model for such data sets might contain hundreds of survival and recapture parameters. Here, we focus on a series of nested models of the Cormack-Jolly-Seber type wherein the likelihood arises from products of multinomial distributions whose cell probabilities are reparameterized in terms of survival ( phi ) and mean capture ( p ) probabilities. This paper presents numerical results on two information-theoretic methods for model selection when the capture probabilities are heterogeneous over individual animals: Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) and a dimension-consistent criterion (CAIC), derived from a Bayesian viewpoint. Quality of model selection was evaluated based on the relative Euclidian distance between standardized theta and theta (parameter theta is vector-valued and contains the survival ( phi ) and mean capture ( p ) probabilities); this quantity (RSS = sigma{(theta i - theta i )/ theta i } 2 ) is a sum of squared bias and variance. Thus, the quality of inference (RSS) was judged by comparing the performance of the two information criteria and the use of the true model (used to generate the data), in relation to the model that provided the smallest RSS. We found that heterogeneity in the capture probabilities had a negligible effect on model selection using AIC or CAIC. Model size increased as sample size increased with both AIC- and CAIC-selected models.
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Source file: Elektronische Wetenschappelijke Tijdschriften
 
 

                             Details for article 28 of 40 found articles
 
<< previous    next >>
 
 Koninklijke Bibliotheek - National Library of the Netherlands