Digital Library
Close Browse articles from a journal
 
<< previous   
     Journal description
       All volumes of the corresponding journal
         All issues of the corresponding volume
           All articles of the corresponding issues
                                       Details for article 6 of 6 found articles
 
 
  “You Got to Remember you Live in Public Housing”: Place-Making in an American Housing Project
 
 
Title: “You Got to Remember you Live in Public Housing”: Place-Making in an American Housing Project
Author: Blokland, Talja
Appeared in: Housing, theory and society
Paging: Volume 25 (2008) nr. 1 pages 31-46
Year: 2008
Contents: Housing projects in the USA have suffered from stigma and a negative image ever since the first projects were built. An examination of the history of American housing policy can help us to understand this on one level. The strength of the dominant discourse, of housing projects as the last resort for those who fail to be part of mainstream society, is reflected in the fact that the mental geography among residents and outsiders of “The Ghetto”, a small housing project in an otherwise mixed neighbourhood in New Haven, CT, USA, is one of a “fucking depressing” place one would rather not be. This paper discusses how this stigma developed, why residents incorporate this image and the low status of their neighbourhood into their accounts of what the place where they live is like, and what problems this causes. In particular, it addresses the issues of the absence of neighbourhood attachment as place attachment, even though residents “do community” all the time, and the consequences of the lack of place attachments for bringing neighbours together to get things done. It uses Charles Tilly's theory of durable inequality, especially his concept of “emulation”, to reflect theoretically on the connection between place attachment, stigma and wider social structures in which people's life projects are embedded. The paper shows that, in contrast to what urban policy-makers might like to see, residents refuse to engage with their neighbourhood, as attaching themselves through neighbourhood action to “the community” would imply a recognition that they are in fact the type of person the projects are “meant” for in the dominant discourse of subsidized housing; losers with whom no-one wants to identify or be identified.
Publisher: Routledge
Source file: Elektronische Wetenschappelijke Tijdschriften
 
 

                             Details for article 6 of 6 found articles
 
<< previous   
 
 Koninklijke Bibliotheek - National Library of the Netherlands