|
| << vorige | volgende >> |
Tijdschrift beschrijving
Alle jaargangen van het bijbehorende tijdschrift
Alle afleveringen van het bijbehorende jaargang
Alle artikelen van de bijbehorende aflevering
Details van artikel 8 van 13 gevonden artikelen
| Titel: |
Rigour in research and peer-review: a reply |
| Auteur: |
Alkass, Sabah Mazerolle, Mark Harris, Frank |
| Verschenen in: |
Construction management & economics |
| Paginering: | Jaargang 16 (1998) nr. 2 pagina's 139-140 |
| Jaar: |
1998-03-01 |
| Inhoud: |
Discussion and constructive criticism of research work when based on facts and sound scientific arguments are good practice which not only enrich research work but potentially improve the findings. For these reasons, they should be encouraged. However, when discussions are put forward out of ignorance for the sake of criticism to attack the integrity of some particular research, and to that matter the integrity of its researchers and the reviewers ability to judge researchers contribution, then it not only becomes dangerous but is on the verge of being irresponsible. This should not go unchallenged. This note addresses the issues brought forth in (Fenn, P. (1997) Construction Management and Economics, 15 (4), 383-5. |
| Uitgever: |
Routledge |
| Bronbestand: |
Elektronische Wetenschappelijke Tijdschriften |
Details van artikel 8 van 13 gevonden artikelen
| << vorige | volgende >> |