|
| << vorige | volgende >> |
Tijdschrift beschrijving
Alle jaargangen van het bijbehorende tijdschrift
Alle afleveringen van het bijbehorende jaargang
Alle artikelen van de bijbehorende aflevering
Details van artikel 5 van 8 gevonden artikelen
| Titel: |
From Missile Defense to Preemption: Can (or Should) NATO's Strategic Debates be Managed? |
| Auteur: |
Rafferty, Kirsten L. |
| Verschenen in: |
Comparative strategy |
| Paginering: | Jaargang 23 (2004) nr. 2 pagina's 173-195 |
| Jaar: |
2004-04-01 |
| Inhoud: |
In the post-Cold War era, two potentially serious strategic debates—over the development and deployment of a US-based missile defense and the use of preemptive war to counter proliferation threats—reflect fundamental, long-standing disagreements over NATO's strategic doctrine, and particularly beliefs concerning the definition of vital interests and the most appropriate strategies and instruments for preserving those interests. This article evaluates the threat these debates really pose to NATO by comparing them to Cold War-era deterrence debates. It suggests the conditions under which such disputes are likely to be most disruptive to the alliance, and it prescribes how member states can handle them to limit permanent damage. |
| Uitgever: |
Routledge |
| Bronbestand: |
Elektronische Wetenschappelijke Tijdschriften |
Details van artikel 5 van 8 gevonden artikelen
| << vorige | volgende >> |