Educational Outcomes, Modern and Postmodern Interpretations: response to Smyth and Dow
Title:
Educational Outcomes, Modern and Postmodern Interpretations: response to Smyth and Dow
Author:
Hargreaves, Andy Moore, Shawn
Appeared in:
British journal of sociology of education
Paging:
Volume 21 (2000) nr. 1 pages 27-42
Year:
2000-03-01
Contents:
Drawing on research in Canada as well as studies in Australia and elsewhere, this paper challenges the arguments of Smyth and Dow (British Journal of Sociology in Education, 19(3), pp. 291-303) that outcomes-based education necessarily embodies a form of technical rationality which routinizes, proletarianizes and deskills teachers and their work. This paper criticizes Smyth and Dow for applying a universalistic and monolithic labour process theory to outcomes issues, for paying little or no attention to published evidence and argument on outcomes, and for being insensitive to the variable geometries of the outcomes phenomenon across different contexts. This paper, by contrast, identifies how investigating outcomes in a context of socialist policy-making, where equity goals are explicit and high discretion is granted to teachers, can contribute to clearer understanding of the variable postmodern geometries and educational possibilities of outcomes technology. These possibilities include fostering stronger collegiality among teachers, and democratic inclusion of pupils and parents in the teaching and learning process.
Journal description