Digitale Bibliotheek
Sluiten Bladeren door artikelen uit een tijdschrift
 
   volgende >>
     Tijdschrift beschrijving
       Alle jaargangen van het bijbehorende tijdschrift
         Alle afleveringen van het bijbehorende jaargang
           Alle artikelen van de bijbehorende aflevering
                                       Details van artikel 1 van 12 gevonden artikelen
 
 
  After vs. priming effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on upper extremity motor recovery in patients with subacute stroke
 
 
Titel: After vs. priming effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on upper extremity motor recovery in patients with subacute stroke
Auteur: Fusco, Augusto
Iosa, Marco
Venturiero, Vincenzo
De Angelis, Domenico
Morone, Giovanni
Maglione, Luisa
Bragoni, Maura
Coiro, Paola
Pratesi, Luca
Paolucci, Stefano
Verschenen in: Restorative neurology and neuroscience
Paginering: Jaargang 32 (2014) nr. 2 pagina's 301-312
Jaar: 2014-01-07
Inhoud: Purpose: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the motor cortex seems to be effective in improving motor performance in patients with chronic stroke, while some recent findings have reported conflicting results for the subacute phase. We aimed to verify whether upper extremity motor rehabilitation could be enhanced by treatment with tDCS administered before a rehabilitative session. Methods: Hand dexterity and force in 16 individuals with subacute stroke were assessed before (T0) and after anodal stimulation (T1) and after a successive session of motor rehabilitation (T2) in a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, crossover trial. To confirm the value of the device as a specific effector, behavioral tests were also administered. Results: Anodal and sham stimulation plus rehabilitation significantly improved manual dexterity (repeated-measure Anova: A-tDCS: p = 0.005; S-tDCS: p = 0.042). Post hoc analysis revealed a significant stimulation effect only for A-tDCS (p = 0.013 between T0 and T1) and not for S-tDCS, whereas the rehabilitation effect (between T1 and T2) was not significant in either group. Hand force and behavioral features were unchanged. Conclusions: Anodal brain stimulation improves hand dexterity but does not increase the effectiveness of the rehabilitation directly. These results suggest the presence of aftereffects, not priming effects, of A-tDCS superimposed onto motor learning phenomena.
Uitgever: IOS Press
Bronbestand: Elektronische Wetenschappelijke Tijdschriften
 
 

                             Details van artikel 1 van 12 gevonden artikelen
 
   volgende >>
 
 Koninklijke Bibliotheek - Nationale Bibliotheek van Nederland