|
| << previous | next >> |
Journal description
All volumes of the corresponding journal
All issues of the corresponding volume
All articles of the corresponding issues
Details for article 5 of 10 found articles
| Title: |
Quality of life after multiple trauma -- summary and recommendations of the consensus conference |
| Author: |
E. Neugebauer B. Bouillon M. Bullinger S. Wood-Dauphinée |
| Appeared in: |
Restorative neurology and neuroscience |
| Paging: | Volume 20 (2002) nr. 3-4 pages 161-167 |
| Year: |
2002-12-04 |
| Contents: |
In October 1999, an international and interdisciplinary consensus conference was held about the assessment and application of quality of life (QoL) measures after multiple trauma. Four working groups represented the following patients: children with traumatic brain injury (TBI); adults with TBI, adults with multiple injuries (but without TBI), and adults with spinal cord injury. According to predefined questions, the groups tried to identify the relevant problems of the patients, at different time points after the traumatic event. A review of the existing instruments for quality of life assessment and the evidence of their application in trauma patients in the scientific literature was performed by each group. Based on the results of these literature reviews it was concluded that there are not enough data to establish "evidence-based" guidelines for QoL assessments in these patients. Nevertheless, the groups comprised of experts clinicians and methodologists, agreed on the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the SF-36 as generic tools for QoL assessment across all trauma patients. It was further recommended to use these generic tools in combination with condition-specific instruments to better reflect the specific problems of the patients. Finally, the whole group suggested that it was not appropriate to view this conference as a "final report" about QoL assessment in trauma patients, but rather it should be seen as a starting point for increased efforts to initiate clinical research projects using QoL as an outcome, to develop better instruments, and to include QoL assessments into daily routines. |
| Publisher: |
IOS Press |
| Source file: |
Elektronische Wetenschappelijke Tijdschriften |
Details for article 5 of 10 found articles
| << previous | next >> |