|
| << vorige | volgende >> |
Tijdschrift beschrijving
Alle jaargangen van het bijbehorende tijdschrift
Alle afleveringen van het bijbehorende jaargang
Alle artikelen van de bijbehorende aflevering
Details van artikel 5 van 17 gevonden artikelen
| Titel: |
Comparison of IMPROVE and NIOSH Carbon Measurements |
| Auteur: |
Chow, Judith C. Watson, John G. Crow, Dale Lowenthal, Douglas H. Merrifield, Thomas |
| Verschenen in: |
Aerosol science and technology |
| Paginering: | Jaargang 34 (2001) nr. 1 pagina's 23-34 |
| Jaar: |
2001-01-01 |
| Inhoud: |
Organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) are operationally defined by the analysis methods, and different methods give in different results. The IMPROVE (Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments) and NIOSH (National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health) thermal evolution protocols present different operational definitions. These protocols are applied to 60 ambient and source samples from different environments using the same instrument to quantify differences in implemented protocols on the same instrument. The protocols are equivalent for total carbon sampled on quartz-fiber filters. NIOSH EC was typically less than half of IMPROVE EC. The primary difference is the allocation of carbon evolving at the NIOSH 850°C temperature in a helium atmosphere to the OC rather than EC fraction. Increasing light transmission and reflectance during this temperature step indicate that this fraction should be classified as EC. When this portion of NIOSH OC is added to NIOSH EC, the IMPROVE and NIOSH analyses are in good agreement. The most probable explanation is that mineral oxides in the complex particle mixture on the filter are supplying oxygen to neighboring carbon particles at this high temperature. This has been demonstrated by the principle of the thermal manganese oxidation method that is also commonly used to distinguish OC from EC. For both methods, the optical pyrolysis adjustment to the EC fractions was always higher for transmittance than for reflectance. This is a secondary cause of differences between the two methods, with transmittance resulting in a lower EC loading than reflectance. The difference was most pronounced for very black filters on which neither reflectance nor transmittance accurately detected further blackening due to pyrolysis. |
| Uitgever: |
Taylor & Francis |
| Bronbestand: |
Elektronische Wetenschappelijke Tijdschriften |
Details van artikel 5 van 17 gevonden artikelen
| << vorige | volgende >> |