Digital Library
Close Browse articles from a journal
 
   next >>
     Journal description
       All volumes of the corresponding journal
         All issues of the corresponding volume
           All articles of the corresponding issues
                                       Details for article 1 of 9 found articles
 
 
  A comparison of performance outcomes between the Minnesota Rate of Manipulation Test and the Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test
 
 
Title: A comparison of performance outcomes between the Minnesota Rate of Manipulation Test and the Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test
Author: Lynn R. Surrey
Kimberly Nelson
Cheri Delelio
Danielle Mathie-Majors
Natasha Omel-Edwards
Jack Shumaker
Gretchen Thurber
Appeared in: Work
Paging: Volume 20 (2003) nr. 2 pages 97-102
Year: 2003-04-02
Contents: This study examined the performance outcomes between two tests of manual dexterity, the Minnesota Rate of Manipulation Test [1] and the Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test (1981). Even though the tests are constructed differently and are different versions of the Complete Minnesota Dexterity tests, both tests utilize the same instruction manual and the same normative data. The researchers measured 233 random participants at a Midwestern international airport and in the student center at a local university in Indiana. Each participant completed three trials of a subtest on both versions of the test. One sample t-tests on difference scores indicated statistically significant differences on outcomes of both subtest comparisons as well as overall test score differences (p < 0.000). These significantly different outcomes on the two tests illustrate the need to establish separate normative data on the latest version of the test, the Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test.
Publisher: IOS Press
Source file: Elektronische Wetenschappelijke Tijdschriften
 
 

                             Details for article 1 of 9 found articles
 
   next >>
 
 Koninklijke Bibliotheek - National Library of the Netherlands