Digitale Bibliotheek
Sluiten Bladeren door artikelen uit een tijdschrift
     Tijdschrift beschrijving
       Alle jaargangen van het bijbehorende tijdschrift
         Alle afleveringen van het bijbehorende jaargang
                                       Alle artikelen van de bijbehorende aflevering
 
                             53 gevonden resultaten
nr titel auteur tijdschrift jaar jaarg. afl. pagina('s) type
1 A case study of researchers’ knowledge and opinions about the ethical review process for research in Botswana Ralefala, Dimpho
2018
1 p. 1-14
artikel
2 Advance directives in dementia research: The opinions and arguments of clinical researchers − an empirical study Jongsma, Karin
2015
1 p. 4-14
artikel
3 An Apple a day keeps the research ethics committee away? Hunter, David
2015
1 p. 2-3
artikel
4 AREC regional workshop report: poor supervision Bannister, Niki
2012
1 p. 55-56
artikel
5 Are research ethics guidelines culturally competent? Gray, Ben
2017
1 p. 23-41
artikel
6 A review of ethical frameworks for the disclosure of individual research results in population-based genetic and genomic research Budin-Ljøsne, Isabelle
2012
1 p. 25-42
artikel
7 Autonomy online: Jacques Ellul and the Facebook emotional manipulation study Gertz, Nolen
2016
1 p. 55-61
artikel
8 Conducting ethical research with correctional populations: Do researchers and IRB members know the federal regulations? Johnson, Mark E
2014
1 p. 6-16
artikel
9 Do participants who are harmed in research face too many barriers to claiming compensation? Kerrison, Susan
2012
1 p. 49-54
artikel
10 Editorial Edwards, Sarah JL
2012
1 p. 3-5
artikel
11 Editor’s choice Edwards, Sarah JL
2012
1 p. 7-8
artikel
12 Ethical complexities in child co-research Spriggs, Merle
2019
1 p. 1-16
artikel
13 Evolving power dynamics in an unconventional, powerless ethics committee Tolich, Martin
2017
1 p. 42-52
artikel
14 Examining the use of consent forms to promote dissemination of research results to participants Curran, Dorothyann
2019
1 p. 1-28
artikel
15 Expert perspectives on ethics review of international data-intensive research: Working towards mutual recognition Dove, Edward S
2018
1 p. 1-25
artikel
16 Exploring the socioethical dilemmas in the use of a global health archive Holmes, Matthew James Vaughton
2019
1 p. 1-9
artikel
17 Facebook emotional contagion experiment controversy Hunter, David
2016
1 p. 2-3
artikel
18 Facebook’s emotional contagion study and the ethical problem of co-opted identity in mediated environments where users lack control Selinger, Evan
2016
1 p. 35-43
artikel
19 Facebook’s flawed emotion experiment: Antisocial research on social network users Shaw, David
2016
1 p. 29-34
artikel
20 From obedience to contagion: Discourses of power in Milgram, Zimbardo, and the Facebook experiment Recuber, Timothy
2016
1 p. 44-54
artikel
21 From research governance to research integrity: What’s in a name? Edwards, Sarah JL
2013
1 p. 3-5
artikel
22 Hostage authorship and the problem of dirty hands Bülow, William
2018
1 p. 1-9
artikel
23 How safe are new medical devices? Humphreys, Stephen J.
2012
1 p. 43-48
artikel
24 Inducing an epileptic seizure for research – analysis Temple, Alice
2012
1 p. 61-62
artikel
25 Informed consent and the Facebook emotional manipulation study Flick, Catherine
2016
1 p. 14-28
artikel
26 Involuntary dances Marcalo, Dr Rita
2012
1 p. 57-59
artikel
27 Making researchers moral: Why trustworthiness requires more than ethics guidelines and review Johnsson, Linus
2014
1 p. 29-46
artikel
28 Manipulation of information in medical research: Can it be morally justified? Lignou, Sapfo
2012
1 p. 9-23
artikel
29 Migraine research case – equipoise Hunter, David
2012
1 p. 63-64
artikel
30 Mutual support relationships amongst sex workers Testa, Georgia
2014
1 p. 58-59
artikel
31 Native bush regeneration – post-fire photo project Hunter, David
2015
1 p. 61-61
artikel
32 Navigating research ethics in the absence of an ethics review board: The importance of space for sharing Giraud, Cécile
2019
1 p. 1-17
artikel
33 Negotiating access to research sites and participants within an African context: The case of Cameroon Vuban, Joyce Afuh
2019
1 p. 1-23
artikel
34 Non-negligent harm, clinical trials and the NHS: Should research ethics committees be activists? Hunter, David
2017
1 p. 2-3
artikel
35 Observations online: Finding the ethical boundaries of Facebook research Willis, Roxana
2019
1 p. 1-17
artikel
36 PAeDS-MoRe: A framework for the development and review of research assent protocols involving children and adolescents Constand, Marissa
2015
1 p. 15-38
artikel
37 Personal internet archives and ethics Lomborg, Stine
2013
1 p. 20-31
artikel
38 Refrigerator safety study Hunter, David
2013
1 p. 44-45
artikel
39 Resolving ethical challenges when researching with minority and vulnerable populations: LGBTIQ victims of violence, harassment and bullying Roffee, James A
2017
1 p. 4-22
artikel
40 Rethinking research ethics committees in low- and medium-income countries Bain, Luchuo Engelbert
2018
1 p. 1-7
artikel
41 Risk adapted regulation of clinical trials Edwards, Sarah JL
2014
1 p. 2-5
artikel
42 Scientific integrity and the market for lemons Cottrell, Richard C
2014
1 p. 17-28
artikel
43 Social research in sport (and beyond): Notes on exceptions to informed consent Fleming, Scott
2013
1 p. 32-43
artikel
44 SUPPORT Case Commentary Hunter, David
2014
1 p. 60-61
artikel
45 Teenage sexual health and activity Testa, Georgia
2013
1 p. 46-48
artikel
46 The Association of Research Ethics Committees (AREC) 2013
1 p. 2-2
artikel
47 The ethics of disseminating dual-use knowledge Kuhlau, Frida
2013
1 p. 6-19
artikel
48 The ethics of metaphor as a research tool Manhas, Kiran Pohar
2015
1 p. 42-51
artikel
49 The Ottawa statement on the ethical design and conduct of cluster randomized trials: A short report Weijer, Charles
2015
1 p. 52-60
artikel
50 The perils of early study discontinuation Nusbaum, Neil
2015
1 p. 39-41
artikel
51 Untangling research and practice: What Facebook’s “emotional contagion” study teaches us boyd, danah
2016
1 p. 4-13
artikel
52 Views on the right to withdraw from randomised controlled trials assessing quality of life after mastectomy and breast reconstruction (QUEST): findings from the QUEST perspectives study (QPS) Bidad, N.
2014
1 p. 47-57
artikel
53 Who protects participants in non-inferiority trials when the outcome is death? Palmas, Walter
2018
1 p. 1-6
artikel
                             53 gevonden resultaten
 
 Koninklijke Bibliotheek - Nationale Bibliotheek van Nederland