nr |
titel |
auteur |
tijdschrift |
jaar |
jaarg. |
afl. |
pagina('s) |
type |
1 |
A phase II trial and quality-of-life analysis of a 5-day regimen of oral 5-fluorouracil bracketed by a 7-day regimen of oral eniluracil in untreated patients with unresectable or metastatic colorectal carcinoma
|
Hobday, TimothyJ. |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 47-48 2 p. |
artikel |
2 |
A randomized assessment of three quality-of-life questionnaires for patients with prostate cancer undergoing different radiation treatments
|
Senter, KimberlyK. |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 31-33 3 p. |
artikel |
3 |
A rasch analysis of the functional scales of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and the implications for clinical significance
|
Smith, AdamB. |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 34-35 2 p. |
artikel |
4 |
Assessing meaningful change over time in quality of life: A user's guide for clinicians
|
Sprangers, MirjamA.G. |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 8- 1 p. |
artikel |
5 |
Assessing the clinical significance of quality-of-life measures in oncology research: State of the science
|
Sloan, Jeff A |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 1-4 4 p. |
artikel |
6 |
Assessing the clinical significance of single items relative to summated scores
|
Sloan, JeffA. |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 6-7 2 p. |
artikel |
7 |
Assessment of palliation in patients with lung cancer: Comparisons between patient symptom diary scores and “minimum clinical change” in quality-of-life scores
|
Brundage, MichaelD. |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 23-24 2 p. |
artikel |
8 |
Clarifying the significance of treatment effects on quality-of-life dimensions using structural equation modeling: Example from peripheral arterial obstructive diseases
|
Marquis, Patrick |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 37- 1 p. |
artikel |
9 |
Clinical benefit in patients with cancer of the pancreas: How does it compare with clinically significant changes in quality-of-life scores?
|
Bezjak, Andrea |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 12-14 3 p. |
artikel |
10 |
Clinical significance of changes in quality-of-life scores during neoadjuvant treatment of esophageal cancer
|
Blazeby, JaneM. |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 38-39 2 p. |
artikel |
11 |
Clinical significance of quality of life: The patient advocate perspective
|
Chauhan, Cynthia |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 30- 1 p. |
artikel |
12 |
Confirmatory factor analysis and clinical significance of the illness intrusiveness ratings scale in men and women with common cancer diagnoses
|
Devins, GeraldM. |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 25-26 2 p. |
artikel |
13 |
Correlations between target scores and anchor ratings on a health transition questionnaire
|
Osoba, David |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 26-27 2 p. |
artikel |
14 |
Group versus individual approaches to understanding the clinical significance of differences or changes in quality of life
|
Cella, David |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 6- 1 p. |
artikel |
15 |
Improving the quality of life for patients with cancer through the cancer supportive care program and web site
|
Rosenbaum, ErnestH. |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 11-12 2 p. |
artikel |
16 |
Interpretation of change and longitudinal validity of the quality of life for respiratory illness questionnaire in inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation
|
van Stel, HenkF. |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 17-18 2 p. |
artikel |
17 |
Interpretation of quality-of-life data from a clinician's point of view: Getting to the clinical part of clinically meaningful change
|
Dennison, CherylR. |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 40-41 2 p. |
artikel |
18 |
Long-term quality of life associated with a chemotherapy-based regimen for newly diagnosed central nervous system germ cell tumors: The first international cooperative trial
|
Sands, StephenA. |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 28- 1 p. |
artikel |
19 |
Meaningful change in cancer-specific quality-of-life scores: Differences between improvement and worsening
|
Dineen, Kelly |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 41-42 2 p. |
artikel |
20 |
Measurement of fatigue: Determining minimally important clinical differences
|
Schwartz, AnnaL. |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 14-16 3 p. |
artikel |
21 |
Measuring the quality of life of patients with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving techniques
|
Hardy, MariaM. |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 30-31 2 p. |
artikel |
22 |
Methods for explaining the clinical significance of health status measures
|
Guyatt, GordonH. |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 5- 1 p. |
artikel |
23 |
Minimal important difference: Can we predict its magnitude?
|
Ringash, JolieG. |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 22-23 2 p. |
artikel |
24 |
Patient, clinician, and population perspectives on determining the clinical significance of quality-of-life scores
|
Frost, MarleneH. |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 7-8 2 p. |
artikel |
25 |
Quality-of-life and behavioral follow-up study of pediatric craniopharyngioma survivors
|
Sands, StephenA. |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 29- 1 p. |
artikel |
26 |
Quality-of-life changes during the first cycle of myelosuppressive chemotherapy
|
Fortner, BarryV. |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 46-47 2 p. |
artikel |
27 |
Quality-of-life measures as leading indicators of adverse clinical events after bone marrow and stem cell transplantation
|
Bush, NigelE. |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 9-11 3 p. |
artikel |
28 |
Quality of life of cancer patients as reported in a tumor registry follow-up
|
Harris, MarcellineR. |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 43-44 2 p. |
artikel |
29 |
Response shift in individualized quality of life in patients with advanced prostate cancer
|
Rees, JonathanE. |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 33-34 2 p. |
artikel |
30 |
The cancer outcomes measurement working group: Evaluating the state of the science and developing recommendations for improving outcomes assessment in cancer
|
Snyder, Claire |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 21- 1 p. |
artikel |
31 |
The clinical significance of QOL results: Practical considerations for specific audiences
|
Symonds, Tara |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 8-9 2 p. |
artikel |
32 |
Use of event charts for summarizing clinically significant changes in oncology quality-of-life data
|
Atherton, PamelaJ. |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 48-49 2 p. |
artikel |
33 |
Use of individual quality-of-life data in oncology consultations: Approach to interpretation of individual results and physicians' feedback on clinical usefulness
|
Velikova, GalinaI. |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 35-36 2 p. |
artikel |
34 |
Using patient- and clinician-rated anchors to evaluate change on the functional assessment of cancer therapy—biologic response modifiers
|
Hahn, ElizabethA. |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 19-20 2 p. |
artikel |
35 |
What does it all mean? Using health-related quality-of-life data to interpret treatment outcomes
|
Leidy, NancyK. |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 39-40 2 p. |
artikel |
36 |
What is measured by the schedule for the evaluation of individual quality of life-direct weighting?
|
Vielhaber, Annette |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 44-45 2 p. |
artikel |
37 |
What is the relationship between clinical and health-related quality-of-life measures?
|
Hagan, Michael |
|
2002 |
24 |
S2 |
p. 16-17 2 p. |
artikel |