Fine root dynamics for forests on contrasting soils in the colombian Amazon
Titel:
Fine root dynamics for forests on contrasting soils in the colombian Amazon
Auteur:
E. M. Jiménez F. H. Moreno J. Lloyd M. C. Peñuela S. Patiño
Verschenen in:
Biogeosciences discussions
Paginering:
Jaargang 6 (2009) nr. 2 pagina's 3415-3453
Jaar:
2009
Inhoud:
It has been hypothesized that in a gradient of increase of soil resources carbon allocated to belowground production (fine roots) decreases. To evaluate this hypothesis, we measured the mass and production of fine roots (<2 mm) by two methods: 1) ingrowth cores and, 2) sequential soil coring, during 2.2 years in two lowland forests with different soils in the colombian Amazon. Differences of soil resources were determined by the type and physical and chemical properties of soil: a forest on loamy soil (Ultisol) at the Amacayacu National Natural Park and, the other on white sands (Spodosol) at the Zafire Biological Station, located in the Forest Reservation of the Calderón River. We found that mass and production of fine roots was significantly different between soil depths (0–10 and 10–20 cm) and also between forests. White-sand forest allocated more carbon to fine roots than the clayey forest; the production in white-sand forest was twice (2.98 and 3.33 Mg C ha<sup>−1 year<sup>−1, method 1 and 2, respectively) as much as in clayey forest (1.51 and 1.36–1.03 Mg C ha<sup>−1 year<sup>−1, method 1 and 2, respectively); similarly, the average of fine root mass was higher in the white-sand forest (10.94 Mg C ha<sup>−1) than in the forest on clay soils (3.04–3.64 Mg C ha<sup>−1). The mass of fine roots also showed a temporal variation related to rainfall, such that production of fine roots decreased substantially in the dry period of the year 2005. Our results suggest that soil resources play an important role in patterns of carbon allocation in these forests; carbon allocated to above-and belowground organs is different between forest types, in such a way that a trade-off above/belowground seems to exist; as a result, it is probable that there are not differences in total net primary productivity between these two forests: does belowground offset lower aboveground production in poorer soils?