|
| << vorige | volgende >> |
Tijdschrift beschrijving
Alle jaargangen van het bijbehorende tijdschrift
Alle afleveringen van het bijbehorende jaargang
Alle artikelen van de bijbehorende aflevering
Details van artikel 21 van 47 gevonden artikelen
| Titel: |
Influence of Oral Discussion on Written Argument |
| Auteur: |
Reznitskaya, Alina Anderson, Richard C. McNurlen, Brian Nguyen-Jahiel, Kim Archodidou, Anthi Kim, So-young |
| Verschenen in: |
Discourse processes |
| Paginering: | Jaargang 32 (2001) nr. 2-3 pagina's 155-175 |
| Jaar: |
2001-11-01 |
| Inhoud: |
This article examines the effects of participation in oral argumentation on the development of individual reasoning as expressed in persuasive essays. Engagement in oral argumentation is the essential feature of a classroom discussion method called collaborative reasoning. A premise of this method is that reasoning is fundamentally dialogical and, hence, the development of reasoning is best nurtured in supportive dialogical settings such as group discussion. Students from 3 classrooms participated in collaborative reasoning discussions for a period of 5 weeks. Then, these students and students from 3 comparable classrooms who had not engaged in collaborative reasoning wrote persuasive essays. The essays of collaborative reasoning students contained a significantly greater number of relevant arguments, counter-arguments, rebuttals, formal argument devices, and uses of text information. |
| Uitgever: |
Routledge |
| Bronbestand: |
Elektronische Wetenschappelijke Tijdschriften |
Details van artikel 21 van 47 gevonden artikelen
| << vorige | volgende >> |