|
| << vorige |
Tijdschrift beschrijving
Alle jaargangen van het bijbehorende tijdschrift
Alle afleveringen van het bijbehorende jaargang
Alle artikelen van de bijbehorende aflevering
Details van artikel 9 van 9 gevonden artikelen
| Titel: |
Simulations of the Submission Decision in the Research Assessment Exercise; the 'who' and 'where' decision |
| Auteur: |
Talib, Ameen Ali |
| Verschenen in: |
Education economics |
| Paginering: | Jaargang 7 (1999) nr. 1 pagina's 39-51 |
| Jaar: |
1999-04 |
| Inhoud: |
This paper identifies and discusses the two 'levels' of analysis required to perform well in the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE). The first level is the 'Quantity versus quantity' trade-off decision(i.e. the number of staff to be submitted as research-active—the 'who' decision). The second level is deciding on the unit of assessment panel to submit under (i.e. the 'where'—the 'chioce' decision). The inclusion of research-active staff in a RAE submission (the 'who' decision) is reduced to a maximisation formula. However, to maximise returns form the RAE submissions, institutions need to go beyond the quality and quantity trade-off decision. The multidisciplinary nature of many departments creates a need for another level of analysis; the choice of unit of assessment (the 'where' decision). The example of business of business schools was used to illusstrate the issue. |
| Uitgever: |
Routledge |
| Bronbestand: |
Elektronische Wetenschappelijke Tijdschriften |
Details van artikel 9 van 9 gevonden artikelen
| << vorige |