|
| << previous | next >> |
Journal description
All volumes of the corresponding journal
All issues of the corresponding volume
All articles of the corresponding issues
Details for article 30 of 36 found articles
| Title: |
The proposed field of rehabilitation science and engineering -- A skeptic's appraisal and suggested alternatives |
| Author: |
Marcus J. Fuhrer |
| Appeared in: |
Technology & disability |
| Paging: | Volume 12 (2001) nr. 2-3 pages 145-150 |
| Year: |
2001-04-01 |
| Contents: |
Graduate programs in rehabilitation science are relatively recent emergents that have distinct implications for the future of rehabilitation research. Apropos of being relatively new, these programs are marked by considerable diversity in terms of curricula, the backgrounds of their faculty members, and organizational placement within their respective universities. They are similar, however, in basing their justification in part on the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) report, {\it Enabling America: Assessing the Role of Rehabilitation Science and Engineering} [1], and its advocacy for an integrative field that is titled, ``rehabilitation science and engineering''. This paper describes some of the report's background and critically appraises the proposed field and the reasons why it is championed. An alternative conception of rehabilitation science is outlined, and several needed achievements are highlighted to spur its development. |
| Publisher: |
IOS Press |
| Source file: |
Elektronische Wetenschappelijke Tijdschriften |
Details for article 30 of 36 found articles
| << previous | next >> |