Digitale Bibliotheek
Sluiten Bladeren door artikelen uit een tijdschrift
 
<< vorige   
     Tijdschrift beschrijving
       Alle jaargangen van het bijbehorende tijdschrift
         Alle afleveringen van het bijbehorende jaargang
           Alle artikelen van de bijbehorende aflevering
                                       Details van artikel 42 van 42 gevonden artikelen
 
 
  Why clinicians often disagree about the validity of test results
 
 
Titel: Why clinicians often disagree about the validity of test results
Auteur: Paul Green
Verschenen in: NeuroRehabilitation
Paginering: Jaargang 16 (2002) nr. 4 pagina's 231-236
Jaar: 2002-03-01
Inhoud: Examining the validity of test results using specialised methods is still a relatively new venture and many different approaches are taken to the same task. This paper discusses some of the reasons why discrepant results and differing conclusions may be arrived at by clinicians or researchers, depending on their theoretical and practical choices. These choices include whether to test for effort, what methods to use, how to employ effort tests, what failure criteria to apply and how to interpret individual results. Equally important is the decision about whether or not to employ effort testing to remove error from data in group research studies. No concensus has yet been reached on the need for systematic effort testing in group studies but there are indications that it should be a serious consideration because controlling for invalid data can lead to altered conclusions.
Uitgever: IOS Press
Bronbestand: Elektronische Wetenschappelijke Tijdschriften
 
 

                             Details van artikel 42 van 42 gevonden artikelen
 
<< vorige   
 
 Koninklijke Bibliotheek - Nationale Bibliotheek van Nederland